Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Xeon W-2295
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 vs Xeon W-2295 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 vs Xeon W-2295 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 vs Xeon W-2295: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
2019Why buy it
- ✅+158.6% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Costs $834 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,333 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 169.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 62.6 vs 23.2 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,333 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Xeon W-2295.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2295 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (10,000 vs 12,863).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2295, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon W-2295
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.2 vs 62.6 PassMark/$ ($1,333 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 PRO 3900.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-2295 better than Ryzen 9 PRO 3900?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 vs Xeon W-2295 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
The Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 31,251 points. Launch price was $499.
Xeon W-2295
The Xeon W-2295 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,986 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-2295 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon W-2295 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-2295 — a 11% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2295 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is built on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 scores 31,251 against the Xeon W-2295's 30,986 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,688 vs 1,703, a 0.9% lead for the Xeon W-2295 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,000 vs 12,863 (25% advantage for the Xeon W-2295). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon W-2295.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Xeon W-2295 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 18 / 36+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.8 GHz+12% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+3% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+159% | 24.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | — |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | — |
| PassMark | 31,251 | 30,986 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,688 | 1,703 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,000 | 12,863+29% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2295 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-2295 — the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-2295 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 PRO 3900) vs 4 (Xeon W-2295). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 PRO 3900) vs 48 (Xeon W-2295) — the Xeon W-2295 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X570,B550,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 PRO 3900) and C422 (Xeon W-2295).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Xeon W-2295 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+9% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1024 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-2295 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 PRO 3900) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-2295). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 targets Professional Content Creation, Xeon W-2295 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 rivals Core i9-10900.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Xeon W-2295 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Professional Content Creation | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 was priced at $499, while the Xeon W-2295 came in at $1333. On launch pricing ($499 vs $1333), Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 was $834 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 delivers 62.6 pts/$ vs 23.2 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2295 — making the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 the 91.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Xeon W-2295 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-63% | $1333 |
| Performance per Dollar | 62.6+170% | 23.2 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Xeon W-2295
