
Xeon W-3175X vs EPYC 4464P

Xeon W-3175X

EPYC 4464P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3175X
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 4464P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W-3175X | EPYC 4464P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,999) | ✅ More affordable ($450) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Skylake (server) (2017−2018) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raphael (2023−2025) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W-3175X | EPYC 4464P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+582%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,999) | ✅ More affordable ($450) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 4464P

Xeon W-3175X
The Xeon W-3175X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 255 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 46,125 points. Launch price was $2,999.

EPYC 4464P
The EPYC 4464P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 47,185 points. Launch price was $399.
Processing Power
The Xeon W-3175X packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the EPYC 4464P offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon W-3175X has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon W-3175X versus 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4464P — a 34.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 4464P (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Xeon W-3175X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 4464P uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3175X scores 46,125 against the EPYC 4464P's 47,185 — a 2.3% lead for the EPYC 4464P. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3175X vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4464P.
| Feature | Xeon W-3175X | EPYC 4464P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 28 / 56+133% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 5.4 GHz+42% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.7 GHz+19% |
| L3 Cache | 38.5 MB (total)+20% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 46,125 | 47,185+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,350 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,467 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,358 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W-3175X uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 4464P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-3175X versus 5200 on the EPYC 4464P — the EPYC 4464P supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3175X supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon W-3175X) vs 2 (EPYC 4464P). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon W-3175X) vs 28 (EPYC 4464P) — the Xeon W-3175X offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel C621 (Xeon W-3175X) and AM5,FL1 (EPYC 4464P).
| Feature | Xeon W-3175X | EPYC 4464P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | 5200+129900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 512 GB+419430300% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 48+71% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3175X) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4464P). The EPYC 4464P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon W-3175X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4464P rivals Core i9-13900.
| Feature | Xeon W-3175X | EPYC 4464P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Xeon W-3175X launched at $2999 MSRP, while the EPYC 4464P debuted at $429. At current prices ($2999 vs $450), the EPYC 4464P is $2549 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W-3175X delivers 15.4 pts/$ vs 104.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 4464P — making the EPYC 4464P the 148.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon W-3175X | EPYC 4464P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $429-86% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2999 | $450-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.4 | 104.9+581% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















