Xeon W-3223
VS
Ryzen 5 6600U

Xeon W-3223 vs Ryzen 5 6600U

Intel

Xeon W-3223

8 Cores16 Thrd160 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 6600U

6 Cores12 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3223

#169
Xeon E-2356G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $544
103%
#171
Xeon W-2140B
MSRP: $294|Avg: $99
102%
#176
Xeon 6325P
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
101%
#178
Xeon Silver 4510
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
101%
#179
Xeon W-3223
MSRP: $294|Avg: $294
100%
#182
EPYC Embedded 8224P
MSRP: $855|Avg: $1048
99%
#187
Xeon Gold 5520+
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
98%
#188
EPYC 8124P
MSRP: $639|Avg: $639
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($294) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W-3223 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon W-3223Ryzen 5 6600U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($294)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Rembrandt-U (Zen 3+) (2022) / 6 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 5 6600U ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($294 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon W-3223Ryzen 5 6600U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($294)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-3223 and Ryzen 5 6600U

Intel

Xeon W-3223

The Xeon W-3223 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,956 points. Launch price was $749.

AMD

Ryzen 5 6600U

The Ryzen 5 6600U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-U (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,992 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Xeon W-3223 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 6600U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon W-3223 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Xeon W-3223 versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 6600U — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 6600U (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon W-3223 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 6600U uses Rembrandt-U (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3223 scores 16,956 against the Ryzen 5 6600U's 16,992 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 6600U. L3 cache: 16.5 MB on the Xeon W-3223 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 6600U.

FeatureXeon W-3223Ryzen 5 6600U
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.2 GHz
4.5 GHz+7%
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+21%
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
16.5 MB+3%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
8 MB+1500%
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm
6 nm-57%
Architecture
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Rembrandt-U (Zen 3+) (2022)
PassMark
16,956
16,992
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W-3223 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 6600U uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon W-3223Ryzen 5 6600U
Socket
LGA3647
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%