
Xeon W-3265 vs Core i9-14901E

Xeon W-3265

Core i9-14901E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3265
Performance Per Dollar Core i9-14901E
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W-3265 | Core i9-14901E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,400) | ✅ More affordable ($689) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W-3265 | Core i9-14901E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+397%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,400) | ✅ More affordable ($689) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-3265 and Core i9-14901E

Xeon W-3265
The Xeon W-3265 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,105 points. Launch price was $3,349.

Core i9-14901E
The Core i9-14901E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,298 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Xeon W-3265 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Core i9-14901E offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-3265 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3265 versus 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14901E — a 19.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-14901E (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon W-3265 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-14901E uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3265 scores 30,105 against the Core i9-14901E's 30,298 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i9-14901E. L3 cache: 33 MB on the Xeon W-3265 vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14901E.
| Feature | Xeon W-3265 | Core i9-14901E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+200% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.6 GHz+22% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 2.8 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 33 MB | 36 MB (total)+9% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 30,105 | 30,298 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,894 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 14,262 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W-3265 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-14901E uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2933 on the Xeon W-3265 versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-14901E — the Xeon W-3265 supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3265 supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 136.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon W-3265) vs 2 (Core i9-14901E). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon W-3265) vs 20 (Core i9-14901E) — the Xeon W-3265 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621,C620 (Xeon W-3265) and Intel 600 Series,Intel 700 Series (Core i9-14901E).
| Feature | Xeon W-3265 | Core i9-14901E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2933+58560% | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 | 192 GB+19660700% |
| RAM Channels | 6+200% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64+220% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon W-3265 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Xeon W-3265) vs Yes (Core i9-14901E). The Core i9-14901E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon W-3265 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Xeon W-3265 | Core i9-14901E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | true | Yes |
Value Analysis
The Xeon W-3265 launched at $3684 MSRP, while the Core i9-14901E debuted at $557. At current prices ($3400 vs $689), the Core i9-14901E is $2711 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W-3265 delivers 8.9 pts/$ vs 44.0 pts/$ for the Core i9-14901E — making the Core i9-14901E the 133% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon W-3265 | Core i9-14901E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3684 | $557-85% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3400 | $689-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.9 | 44.0+394% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















