Xeon W-3265
VS
Xeon Platinum 8180M

Xeon W-3265 vs Xeon Platinum 8180M

Intel

Xeon W-3265

24 Cores48 Thrd205 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2019
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8180M

28 Cores56 Thrd205 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3265

#498
Xeon E5-1681 V3
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $200
114%
#499
Xeon W-3275
MSRP: $4449|Avg: $1550
114%
#500
Xeon Gold 6138
MSRP: $2612|Avg: $300
113%
#501
Xeon E5-2690 v4
MSRP: $2090|Avg: $389
113%
#502
Xeon Platinum 8362
MSRP: $6236|Avg: $5740
112%
#503
Xeon W-3275M
MSRP: $4449|Avg: $4449
111%
#504
Xeon E5-2660 v3
MSRP: $1445|Avg: $150
110%
#505
Xeon E5-2679 v4
MSRP: $2702|Avg: $500
109%
#506
Xeon E5-2680 v3
MSRP: $1745|Avg: $212
104%
#507
Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
MSRP: $5945|Avg: $7000
103%
#508
Xeon E7-8895 v2
MSRP: $6841|Avg: $65
102%
#509
EPYC 9754
MSRP: $11900|Avg: $10631
101%
#509
EPYC 9684X
MSRP: $14756|Avg: $14756
101%
#511
Xeon D-1587
MSRP: $1652|Avg: $1443
101%
#512
Xeon E5-2687W v4
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $1138
101%
#513
Xeon W-3265
MSRP: $3684|Avg: $3400
100%
#514
Xeon E5-2658A V3
MSRP: $1832|Avg: $200
99%
#515
Xeon E5-4640 v4
MSRP: $2837|Avg: N/A
97%
#516
Xeon E7-8867 v3
MSRP: $4672|Avg: $4672
97%
#517
Xeon Gold 6150
MSRP: $3358|Avg: $196
96%
#518
Xeon E5-1680 v3
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $200
94%
#519
Xeon E5-2690 v3
MSRP: $2090|Avg: $85
94%
#520
Xeon 6780E
MSRP: $11350|Avg: $8513
94%
#521
Xeon E5-2697A v4
MSRP: $2891|Avg: $121
92%
#522
Xeon Gold 6134
MSRP: $2214|Avg: $378
91%
#523
Xeon Gold 6138T
MSRP: $2742|Avg: $400
91%
#524
Xeon E7-4880 v2
MSRP: $6619|Avg: $185
90%
#524
Xeon E5-2675 V3
MSRP: $1800|Avg: $100
90%
#524
Xeon E5-2676 V3
MSRP: $1800|Avg: $36
90%
#527
Xeon Platinum 8592+
MSRP: $11600|Avg: $11600
89%
#528
Xeon E5-2687W v3
MSRP: $2141|Avg: $749
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8180M

#155
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
MSRP: $799|Avg: $999
103%
#169
Xeon E-2356G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $544
100%
#170
Xeon Platinum 8180M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#171
Xeon W-2140B
MSRP: $294|Avg: $99
99%
#176
Xeon 6325P
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#178
Xeon Silver 4510
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
98%
#179
Xeon W-3223
MSRP: $294|Avg: $294
97%
#182
EPYC Embedded 8224P
MSRP: $855|Avg: $1048
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Xeon W-3265 leads in gaming performance. However, the Xeon Platinum 8180M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightXeon W-3265Xeon Platinum 8180M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($3,400)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Skylake (server) (2017−2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightXeon W-3265Xeon Platinum 8180M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($3,400)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-3265 and Xeon Platinum 8180M

Intel

Xeon W-3265

The Xeon W-3265 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,105 points. Launch price was $3,349.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8180M

The Xeon Platinum 8180M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 30,313 points. Launch price was $13,011.

Processing Power

The Xeon W-3265 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8180M offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8180M has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3265 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8180M — a 19% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3265 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon W-3265 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8180M uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3265 scores 30,105 against the Xeon Platinum 8180M's 30,313 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8180M. L3 cache: 33 MB on the Xeon W-3265 vs 38.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8180M.

FeatureXeon W-3265Xeon Platinum 8180M
Cores / Threads
24 / 48
28 / 56+17%
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz+21%
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+8%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
33 MB
38.5 MB (total)+17%
L2 Cache
24 MB+2300%
1 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
30,105
30,313
Cinebench R23 Multi
25,000
Geekbench 6 Single
1,000
Geekbench 6 Multi
21,854
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches 2933 on the Xeon W-3265 versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8180M — the Xeon W-3265 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8180M supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 1024 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon W-3265) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8180M) — the Xeon W-3265 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621,C620 (Xeon W-3265) and C620 (Xeon Platinum 8180M).

FeatureXeon W-3265Xeon Platinum 8180M
Socket
LGA3647
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
2933+73225%
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
1024
1536 GB+157286300%
RAM Channels
6
6
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
64+33%
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Xeon W-3265) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8180M). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8180M targets Mission Critical Datacenter. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8180M rivals EPYC 7551.

FeatureXeon W-3265Xeon Platinum 8180M
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Mission Critical Datacenter