
Xeon W-3375

Core Ultra 9 285HX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3375
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 285HX
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W-3375 | Core Ultra 9 285HX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($6,000) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake-W (2021) / 10 nm) | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W-3375 | Core Ultra 9 285HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($6,000) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W-3375 and Core Ultra 9 285HX

Xeon W-3375
The Xeon W-3375 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,091 points. Launch price was $4,499.

Core Ultra 9 285HX
The Core Ultra 9 285HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,732 points. Launch price was $650.
Processing Power
The Xeon W-3375 packs 38 cores / 76 threads, while the Core Ultra 9 285HX offers 24 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon W-3375 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3375 versus 5.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285HX — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285HX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon W-3375 uses the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 285HX uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W-3375 scores 59,091 against the Core Ultra 9 285HX's 58,732 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon W-3375. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,818 vs 3,106, a 52.3% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 17,713 vs 22,200 (22.5% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285HX). L3 cache: 57 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3375 vs 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285HX.
| Feature | Xeon W-3375 | Core Ultra 9 285HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 38 / 76+58% | 24 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 5.5 GHz+38% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.8 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 57 MB (total)+58% | 36 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+200% |
| Process | 10 nm | 3 nm-70% |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-W (2021) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 59,091 | 58,732 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,818 | 3,106+71% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,713 | 22,200+25% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W-3375 uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 9 285HX uses FCBGA2114 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Xeon W-3375 versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 285HX — the Core Ultra 9 285HX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3375 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon W-3375) vs 2 (Core Ultra 9 285HX). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon W-3375) vs 24 (Core Ultra 9 285HX) — the Xeon W-3375 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel C621A (Xeon W-3375) and Intel HM870 (Core Ultra 9 285HX).
| Feature | Xeon W-3375 | Core Ultra 9 285HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | FCBGA2114 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+2033% | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64+167% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 9 285HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3375 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support true virtualization. The Core Ultra 9 285HX includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the Xeon W-3375 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3375 rivals EPYC 7543; Core Ultra 9 285HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX3D.
| Feature | Xeon W-3375 | Core Ultra 9 285HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel Arc Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | true | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















