Xeon w3-2535
VS
M4 Pro (12 cores)

Xeon w3-2535 vs M4 Pro (12 cores)

Intel

Xeon w3-2535

10 Cores20 Thrd185 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2024
VS

M4 Pro (12 cores)

12 Cores12 Thrd4 WWMax: 4.51 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon w3-2535

#222
Xeon E-2478
MSRP: $568|Avg: $269
108%
#223
Xeon W-1390
MSRP: $494|Avg: $400
107%
#225
Xeon W-1250
MSRP: $285|Avg: $333
106%
#226
EPYC 9135
MSRP: $1214|Avg: $95
105%
#227
Xeon E-2378
MSRP: $362|Avg: $562
104%
#228
Xeon w3-2525
MSRP: $609|Avg: $800
104%
#230
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $368
103%
#232
EPYC 7282
MSRP: $650|Avg: $199
103%
#233
Xeon w5-2545
MSRP: $889|Avg: $1100
102%
#234
Xeon W-1250P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
102%
#237
Xeon w3-2535
MSRP: $739|Avg: $800
100%
#239
EPYC 7313P
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
100%
#240
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $60
99%
#241
Xeon w5-2555X
MSRP: $1069|Avg: $1145
99%
#242
Xeon E-2246G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $268
99%
#244
Xeon w3-2423
MSRP: $359|Avg: $300
97%
#245
EPYC 8434P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $3137
97%
#247
EPYC 7443P
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $1045
94%
#248
EPYC 4564P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
94%
#249
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
MSRP: $1340|Avg: $1340
94%
#250
EPYC 7D12
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
94%
#251
Xeon W-1390P
MSRP: $594|Avg: $450
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar M4 Pro (12 cores)

#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
108%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
107%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
106%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
103%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
101%
#171
M4 Pro (12 cores)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
98%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
95%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
94%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
94%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
90%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($800) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon w3-2535 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon w3-2535M4 Pro (12 cores)
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($800)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Legacy / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The M4 Pro (12 cores) ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($800 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon w3-2535M4 Pro (12 cores)
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($800)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon w3-2535 and M4 Pro (12 cores)

Intel

Xeon w3-2535

The Xeon w3-2535 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 26.25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 33,367 points. Launch price was $739.

M4 Pro (12 cores)

The M4 Pro (12 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.592 GHz, with boost up to 4.51 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 32,853 points. Launch price was $499.

Processing Power

The Xeon w3-2535 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the M4 Pro (12 cores) offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the M4 Pro (12 cores) has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Xeon w3-2535 versus 4.51 GHz on the M4 Pro (12 cores) — a 2% clock advantage for the Xeon w3-2535 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.592 GHz). The Xeon w3-2535 is built on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon w3-2535 scores 33,367 against the M4 Pro (12 cores)'s 32,853 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon w3-2535. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,500 vs 18,904 (7.7% advantage for the M4 Pro (12 cores)). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,254 vs 3,812, a 51.4% lead for the M4 Pro (12 cores) that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,400 vs 20,076 (47.3% advantage for the M4 Pro (12 cores)).

FeatureXeon w3-2535M4 Pro (12 cores)
Cores / Threads
10 / 20
12 / 12+20%
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz+2%
4.51 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+35%
2.592 GHz
L3 Cache
26.25 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
4 MB+100%
Process
Intel 7 nm
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark
33,367+2%
32,853
Cinebench R23 Multi
17,500
18,904+8%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,254
3,812+69%
Geekbench 6 Multi
12,400
20,076+62%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon w3-2535 uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M4 Pro (12 cores) uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4400 memory speed. The Xeon w3-2535 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon w3-2535) vs 1 (M4 Pro (12 cores)). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon w3-2535) vs 0 (M4 Pro (12 cores)) — the Xeon w3-2535 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: W790 (Xeon w3-2535) and Apple SoC (M4 Pro (12 cores)).

FeatureXeon w3-2535M4 Pro (12 cores)
Socket
LGA4677
none
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4400
LPDDR5x-8000
Max RAM Capacity
2048 GB+3100%
64 GB
RAM Channels
4+300%
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
64
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon w3-2535 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon w3-2535) vs Apple Virtualization (M4 Pro (12 cores)). The M4 Pro (12 cores) includes integrated graphics (M4 Pro 16-core GPU), while the Xeon w3-2535 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon w3-2535 targets Workstation, M4 Pro (12 cores) targets High-end Content Creation. Direct competitor: Xeon w3-2535 rivals EPYC 7313; M4 Pro (12 cores) rivals Ryzen 9 8945HS.

FeatureXeon w3-2535M4 Pro (12 cores)
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
M4 Pro 16-core GPU
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Apple Virtualization
Target Use
Workstation
High-end Content Creation