Xeon W3505
VS
Celeron E3300

Xeon W3505 vs Celeron E3300

Intel

Xeon W3505

2 Cores2 Thrd130 WWMax: 0.53 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Celeron E3300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon W3505 is positioned at rank 970 and the Celeron E3300 is on rank 724, so the Celeron E3300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W3505

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
35708%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
6742%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
5990%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4627%
#535
Xeon W-3245M
MSRP: $5002|Avg: $5002
98%
#536
Xeon W-3265M
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $3500
97%
#969
Xeon E5-2687W v2
MSRP: $2112|Avg: $62
100%
#970
Xeon W3505
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#971
Xeon L5430
MSRP: $390|Avg: $380
99%
#972
Xeon E5-2470
MSRP: $1440|Avg: $125
99%
#973
Xeon E5-2670
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $60
99%
#975
Xeon X3470
MSRP: $589|Avg: $16
97%
#978
Xeon E5-2689
MSRP: $1800|Avg: $18
95%
#979
Xeon E5-2450L
MSRP: $1106|Avg: $78
94%
#980
Xeon X3480
MSRP: $612|Avg: $48
93%
#981
Xeon E5-2687W
MSRP: $1885|Avg: $70
91%
#982
Xeon E5-4610
MSRP: $1219|Avg: $50
91%
#984
Xeon X7550
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $1400
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron E3300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13494%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12751%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9258%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2789%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2209%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1933%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1107%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1092%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
995%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
995%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
984%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
957%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
944%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
940%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
931%
#724
Celeron E3300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#725
Core i7-6700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $60
100%
#726
Core i7-4790K
MSRP: $350|Avg: $93
100%
#727
Celeron E3400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $15
100%
#728
FX-4100
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
99%
#729
Core i5-7440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $30
99%
#730
Core i5-3350P
MSRP: $189|Avg: $25
99%
#732
Core i3-4350T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $20
99%
#733
Athlon II X4 641
MSRP: $102|Avg: $102
98%
#734
Athlon II X3 460
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
98%
#735
Pentium G2100T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
98%
#736
Core i5-3330
MSRP: $182|Avg: $21
98%
#737
Core i3-4330T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
97%
#738
Pentium E5300
MSRP: $62|Avg: $25
97%
#739
Athlon II X2 215
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W3505 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon W3505Celeron E3300
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron E3300 ($10), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($10 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon W3505Celeron E3300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W3505 and Celeron E3300

Intel

Xeon W3505

The Xeon W3505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 0.53 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,163 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Celeron E3300

The Celeron E3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,155 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon W3505 and Celeron E3300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.53 GHz on the Xeon W3505 versus 2.5 GHz on the Celeron E3300 — a 130% clock advantage for the Celeron E3300 (base: 2.53 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon W3505 uses the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron E3300 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W3505 scores 1,163 against the Celeron E3300's 1,155 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon W3505. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Xeon W3505 vs 0 kB on the Celeron E3300.

FeatureXeon W3505Celeron E3300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
0.53 GHz
2.5 GHz+372%
Base Clock
2.53 GHz+1%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1 MB (total)+300%
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Bloomfield (2008−2010)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,163
1,155
Geekbench 6 Single
347
Geekbench 6 Multi
624
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W3505 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron E3300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon W3505Celeron E3300
Socket
LGA1366
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon W3505) / VT-x (Celeron E3300). Primary use case: Celeron E3300 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E3300 rivals Pentium E5200.

FeatureXeon W3505Celeron E3300
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget