Xeon W3505
VS
Core i7-640UM

Xeon W3505 vs Core i7-640UM

Intel

Xeon W3505

2 Cores2 Thrd130 WWMax: 0.53 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Core i7-640UM

2 Cores4 Thrd18 WWMax: 2.27 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon W3505 is positioned at rank 970 and the Core i7-640UM is on rank 1229, so the Xeon W3505 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W3505

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
35708%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
6742%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
5990%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4627%
#535
Xeon W-3245M
MSRP: $5002|Avg: $5002
98%
#536
Xeon W-3265M
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $3500
97%
#969
Xeon E5-2687W v2
MSRP: $2112|Avg: $62
100%
#970
Xeon W3505
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#971
Xeon L5430
MSRP: $390|Avg: $380
99%
#972
Xeon E5-2470
MSRP: $1440|Avg: $125
99%
#973
Xeon E5-2670
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $60
99%
#975
Xeon X3470
MSRP: $589|Avg: $16
97%
#978
Xeon E5-2689
MSRP: $1800|Avg: $18
95%
#979
Xeon E5-2450L
MSRP: $1106|Avg: $78
94%
#980
Xeon X3480
MSRP: $612|Avg: $48
93%
#981
Xeon E5-2687W
MSRP: $1885|Avg: $70
91%
#982
Xeon E5-4610
MSRP: $1219|Avg: $50
91%
#984
Xeon X7550
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $1400
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-640UM

#1217
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
7661%
#1218
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
7548%
#1219
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
6930%
#1220
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
6898%
#1221
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
6835%
#1223
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
6601%
#1224
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
6329%
#1225
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
6319%
#1226
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
6149%
#1229
Core i7-640UM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1230
Celeron 570
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
98%
#1232
Core i7-820QM
MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A
87%
#1233
Core Duo T2700
MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A
73%
#1235
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
62%
#1236
Core Solo T1400
MSRP: $200|Avg: $5
56%
#1237
Core i7-940XM
MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A
54%
#1238
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
53%
#1240
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
48%
#1241
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
44%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W3505 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon W3505Core i7-640UM
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-640UM ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon W3505Core i7-640UM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W3505 and Core i7-640UM

Intel

Xeon W3505

The Xeon W3505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 0.53 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,163 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core i7-640UM

The Core i7-640UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.27 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 1,168 points. Launch price was $305.

Processing Power

The Xeon W3505 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-640UM's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.53 GHz on the Xeon W3505 versus 2.27 GHz on the Core i7-640UM — a 124.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-640UM (base: 2.53 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Xeon W3505 uses the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i7-640UM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W3505 scores 1,163 against the Core i7-640UM's 1,168 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-640UM. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureXeon W3505Core i7-640UM
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
0.53 GHz
2.27 GHz+328%
Base Clock
2.53 GHz+111%
1.2 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Bloomfield (2008−2010)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,163
1,168
Geekbench 6 Single
226
Geekbench 6 Multi
590
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W3505 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-640UM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon W3505Core i7-640UM
Socket
LGA1366
BGA1288
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon W3505) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-640UM). The Core i7-640UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Xeon W3505 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-640UM targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-640UM rivals Core 2 Duo SU9600.

FeatureXeon W3505Core i7-640UM
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Legacy Laptop