Xeon W3530
VS
Core i5-4210H

Xeon W3530 vs Core i5-4210H

Intel

Xeon W3530

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.06 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core i5-4210H

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon W3530 is positioned at rank 859 and the Core i5-4210H is on rank 1003, so the Xeon W3530 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W3530

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
19983%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3773%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3352%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2590%
#484
EPYC 7773X
MSRP: $8800|Avg: $8800
100%
#485
Xeon Gold 6258R
MSRP: $3950|Avg: $1400
98%
#486
EPYC 9175F
MSRP: $4256|Avg: $3703
98%
#488
EPYC 9534
MSRP: $8803|Avg: $2999
97%
#489
EPYC 9654
MSRP: $11805|Avg: $5345
97%
#490
EPYC 7H12
MSRP: $6950|Avg: $1340
96%
#491
EPYC 7742
MSRP: $6950|Avg: $800
96%
#492
Xeon Platinum 8352M
MSRP: $4471|Avg: $4471
95%
#859
Xeon W3530
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
100%
#861
Xeon W3520
MSRP: $284|Avg: $15
100%
#862
Xeon E3-1271 v3
MSRP: $727|Avg: $831
99%
#863
Xeon E5603
MSRP: $188|Avg: N/A
99%
#871
Xeon 6315P
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $160
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4210H

#991
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2140%
#992
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2109%
#993
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1936%
#994
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1927%
#995
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1909%
#997
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1844%
#998
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1768%
#999
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1765%
#1000
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1718%
#1003
Core i5-4210H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1005
Pentium P6000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
100%
#1007
Core i7-3630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1008
Core i7-3610QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1009
Pentium A1020
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
99%
#1010
Core i3-1115GRE
MSRP: $338|Avg: $480
99%
#1011
Core i7-4702MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
99%
#1012
Pentium N4200
MSRP: $161|Avg: $30.89
98%
#1013
Pentium J2900
MSRP: $94|Avg: $20
97%
#1014
Celeron T1700
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
96%
#1015
Celeron T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
96%
#1016
A12-9720P
MSRP: $200|Avg: $25
96%
#1017
Core i5-4300M
MSRP: $227|Avg: N/A
95%
#1018
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($10) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W3530 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon W3530Core i5-4210H
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-4210H ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($10 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon W3530Core i5-4210H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W3530 and Core i5-4210H

Intel

Xeon W3530

The Xeon W3530 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.06 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,059 points. Launch price was $999.

Intel

Core i5-4210H

The Core i5-4210H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,084 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The Xeon W3530 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-4210H offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon W3530 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.06 GHz on the Xeon W3530 versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-4210H — a 13.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-4210H (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon W3530 uses the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-4210H uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W3530 scores 3,059 against the Core i5-4210H's 3,084 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-4210H. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3530 vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4210H.

FeatureXeon W3530Core i5-4210H
Cores / Threads
4 / 8+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.06 GHz
3.5 GHz+14%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
2.9 GHz+4%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+167%
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Bloomfield (2008−2010)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
3,059
3,084
Geekbench 6 Single
1,020
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,916
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W3530 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-4210H uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon W3530Core i5-4210H
Socket
LGA1366
BGA1364
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon W3530) / VT-x (Core i5-4210H). The Core i5-4210H includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon W3530 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4210H targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-4210H rivals Ryzen 5 3550H.

FeatureXeon W3530Core i5-4210H
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Gaming