Xeon W3540 vs Core i3-4160T
Xeon W3540
Core i3-4160T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon W3540 is positioned at rank 843 and the Core i3-4160T is on rank 653, so the Core i3-4160T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W3540
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4160T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon W3540 | Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($18) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon W3540 | Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+79%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($18) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W3540 and Core i3-4160T
Xeon W3540
The Xeon W3540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,075 points. Launch price was $699.
Core i3-4160T
The Core i3-4160T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,087 points. Launch price was $142.
Processing Power
The Xeon W3540 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i3-4160T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon W3540 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon W3540 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i3-4160T — a 3.2% clock advantage for the Xeon W3540 (base: 2.93 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Xeon W3540 uses the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-4160T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W3540 scores 3,075 against the Core i3-4160T's 3,087 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-4160T. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3540 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4160T.
| Feature | Xeon W3540 | Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+3% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.93 GHz | 3.1 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+167% | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 22 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Bloomfield (2008−2010) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 3,075 | 3,087 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 900 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon W3540 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4160T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon W3540 | Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1366 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon W3540) / VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4160T). The Core i3-4160T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Xeon W3540 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4160T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-4160T rivals A10-7800.
| Feature | Xeon W3540 | Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 4400 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Low Power Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Xeon W3540 launched at $284 MSRP, while the Core i3-4160T debuted at $117. At current prices ($10 vs $18), the Xeon W3540 is $8 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon W3540 delivers 307.5 pts/$ vs 171.5 pts/$ for the Core i3-4160T — making the Xeon W3540 the 56.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon W3540 | Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $284 | $117-59% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-44% | $18 |
| Performance per Dollar | 307.5+79% | 171.5 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon W3540 and Core i3-4160T
