Xeon W3680
VS
Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

Xeon W3680 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

Intel

Xeon W3680

6 Cores12 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2010
VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon W3680 is positioned at rank 817 and the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is on rank 168, so the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W3680

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
17567%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3317%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2947%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2277%
#466
Xeon Platinum 8358
MSRP: $4607|Avg: $3145
100%
#467
EPYC 7713
MSRP: $7060|Avg: $1299
99%
#467
EPYC 7662
MSRP: $6150|Avg: $1266
99%
#469
EPYC 9554
MSRP: $9087|Avg: $2795
97%
#470
Xeon Gold 6338T
MSRP: $3139|Avg: $1795
96%
#471
Xeon E5-2650 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $45
96%
#817
Xeon W3680
MSRP: $594|Avg: $26
100%
#819
Xeon E5-2640 v3
MSRP: $939|Avg: $189
99%
#824
Xeon E5-1660 v3
MSRP: $1080|Avg: $198
98%
#827
Xeon W3565
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
3217%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
607%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
540%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
417%
#143
Xeon W-1350P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $250
98%
#145
Xeon 6511P
MSRP: $815|Avg: $815
97%
#168
Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
MSRP: $110|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Dual-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon W3680Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($26)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Gulftown (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon W3680 (2010) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon W3680Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+318%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($26)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W3680 and Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

Intel

Xeon W3680

The Xeon W3680 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,025 points. Launch price was $350.

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

The Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 7,106 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Xeon W3680 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon W3680 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon W3680 versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 — a 2.8% clock advantage for the Xeon W3680 (base: 3.33 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon W3680 uses the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W3680 scores 7,025 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300's 7,106 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W3680 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300.

FeatureXeon W3680Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Cores / Threads
6 / 12+50%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+3%
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.33 GHz+4%
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+50%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Gulftown (2010−2011)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
7,025
7,106+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W3680 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon W3680Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Socket
LGA1366
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon W3680 launched at $594 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 debuted at $110.

FeatureXeon W3680Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
MSRP
$594
$110-81%
Avg Price (30d)
$26
Release Date
2010
2017