Xeon W3680
VS
Ryzen 7 3700U

Xeon W3680 vs Ryzen 7 3700U

Intel

Xeon W3680

6 Cores12 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2010
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 3700U

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 4 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon W3680 is positioned at rank #817 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W3680

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
17567%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3317%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2947%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2277%
#466
Xeon Platinum 8358
MSRP: $4607|Avg: $3145
100%
#467
EPYC 7713
MSRP: $7060|Avg: $1299
99%
#467
EPYC 7662
MSRP: $6150|Avg: $1266
99%
#469
EPYC 9554
MSRP: $9087|Avg: $2795
97%
#470
Xeon Gold 6338T
MSRP: $3139|Avg: $1795
96%
#471
Xeon E5-2650 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $45
96%
#817
Xeon W3680
MSRP: $594|Avg: $26
100%
#819
Xeon E5-2640 v3
MSRP: $939|Avg: $189
99%
#824
Xeon E5-1660 v3
MSRP: $1080|Avg: $198
98%
#827
Xeon W3565
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 7 3700U (2019) utilizes 12 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon W3680Ryzen 7 3700U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($26)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Gulftown (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) / 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon W3680 (2010) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon W3680Ryzen 7 3700U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($26)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon W3680 and Ryzen 7 3700U

Intel

Xeon W3680

The Xeon W3680 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,025 points. Launch price was $350.

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700U

The Ryzen 7 3700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,049 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Xeon W3680 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon W3680 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon W3680 versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700U — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700U (base: 3.33 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon W3680 uses the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700U uses Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon W3680 scores 7,025 against the Ryzen 7 3700U's 7,049 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W3680 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 3700U.

FeatureXeon W3680Ryzen 7 3700U
Cores / Threads
6 / 12+50%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
4 GHz+11%
Base Clock
3.33 GHz+45%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+200%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm
12 nm-63%
Architecture
Gulftown (2010−2011)
Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)
PassMark
7,025
7,049
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,826
Geekbench 6 Single
794
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,115
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon W3680 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon W3680Ryzen 7 3700U
Socket
LGA1366
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon W3680) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 3700U). The Ryzen 7 3700U includes integrated graphics (Radeon RX Vega 10), while the Xeon W3680 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 3700U targets Mainstream Laptop.

FeatureXeon W3680Ryzen 7 3700U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon RX Vega 10
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop