
Xeon w5-3525 vs Xeon Platinum 8352M

Xeon w5-3525

Xeon Platinum 8352M
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon w5-3525
Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8352M
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon w5-3525 | Xeon Platinum 8352M |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($1,392) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,471) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Ice Lake-SP (2021) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon w5-3525 | Xeon Platinum 8352M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+228%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($1,392) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,471) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon w5-3525 and Xeon Platinum 8352M

Xeon w5-3525
The Xeon w5-3525 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 45,311 points. Launch price was $1,339.

Xeon Platinum 8352M
The Xeon Platinum 8352M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 44,406 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon w5-3525 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8352M offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8352M has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w5-3525 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8352M — a 31.3% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-3525 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon w5-3525 uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8352M uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon w5-3525 scores 45,311 against the Xeon Platinum 8352M's 44,406 — a 2% lead for the Xeon w5-3525. L3 cache: 45 MB on the Xeon w5-3525 vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8352M.
| Feature | Xeon w5-3525 | Xeon Platinum 8352M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+37% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+39% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 45 MB | 48 MB (total)+7% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 45,311+2% | 44,406 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon w5-3525 uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8352M uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Xeon w5-3525 versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8352M — the Xeon w5-3525 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 112 (Xeon w5-3525) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8352M) — the Xeon w5-3525 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: W790 (Xeon w5-3525) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8352M).
| Feature | Xeon w5-3525 | Xeon Platinum 8352M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+50% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 112+75% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w5-3525 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon w5-3525 rivals Threadripper PRO 7955WX; Xeon Platinum 8352M rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | Xeon w5-3525 | Xeon Platinum 8352M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Xeon w5-3525 launched at $1339 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8352M debuted at $4471. At current prices ($1392 vs $4471), the Xeon w5-3525 is $3079 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon w5-3525 delivers 32.6 pts/$ vs 9.9 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8352M — making the Xeon w5-3525 the 106.5% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon w5-3525 | Xeon Platinum 8352M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1339-70% | $4471 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1392-69% | $4471 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.6+229% | 9.9 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















