
Xeon w7-2475X vs Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Xeon w7-2475X

Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon w7-2475X
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon w7-2475X | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,544) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon w7-2475X | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,544) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon w7-2475X and Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Xeon w7-2475X
The Xeon w7-2475X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 53,211 points. Launch price was $1,789.

Ryzen AI Max+ 395
The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 55,025 points. Launch price was $450.
Processing Power
The Xeon w7-2475X packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon w7-2475X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-2475X versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon w7-2475X uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon w7-2475X scores 53,211 against the Ryzen AI Max+ 395's 55,025 — a 3.4% lead for the Ryzen AI Max+ 395. L3 cache: 37.5 MB on the Xeon w7-2475X vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395.
| Feature | Xeon w7-2475X | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 40+25% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | 37.5 MB | 64 MB (total)+71% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 53,211 | 55,025+3% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon w7-2475X uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Xeon w7-2475X versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-2475X supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon w7-2475X) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395). PCIe lanes: 112 (Xeon w7-2475X) vs 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) — the Xeon w7-2475X offers 96 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: W790 (Xeon w7-2475X) and FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395).
| Feature | Xeon w7-2475X | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 8000+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+3100% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 8+100% | 4 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 112+600% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w7-2475X) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max+ 395). The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8060S), while the Xeon w7-2475X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Xeon w7-2475X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX; Ryzen AI Max+ 395 rivals Core Ultra 9 285HX.
| Feature | Xeon w7-2475X | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon 8060S |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Xeon w7-2475X launched at $1789 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 debuted at $0. At current prices ($2544 vs $0), the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is $2544 cheaper.
| Feature | Xeon w7-2475X | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1789 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2544 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.9 | — |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















