
Xeon w7-2575X vs Ryzen 9 7945HX

Xeon w7-2575X

Ryzen 9 7945HX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon w7-2575X
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 7945HX
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon w7-2575X | Ryzen 9 7945HX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,860) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) / CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon w7-2575X | Ryzen 9 7945HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,860) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon w7-2575X and Ryzen 9 7945HX

Xeon w7-2575X
The Xeon w7-2575X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,951 points. Launch price was $1,689.

Ryzen 9 7945HX
The Ryzen 9 7945HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2023-03-12. It is based on the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,425 points. Launch price was $700.
Processing Power
The Xeon w7-2575X packs 22 cores / 44 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7945HX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon w7-2575X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-2575X versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7945HX — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7945HX (base: 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon w7-2575X uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7945HX uses Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon w7-2575X scores 52,951 against the Ryzen 9 7945HX's 54,425 — a 2.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 7945HX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,300 vs 2,774, a 18.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 7945HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 19,640 vs 16,214 (19.1% advantage for the Xeon w7-2575X). L3 cache: 45 MB on the Xeon w7-2575X vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7945HX.
| Feature | Xeon w7-2575X | Ryzen 9 7945HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 22 / 44+38% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.4 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+20% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 45 MB | 64 MB (total)+42% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | CCD = 5 nm, I/O = 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 52,951 | 54,425+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 34,521 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,300 | 2,774+21% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 19,640+21% | 16,214 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon w7-2575X uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7945HX uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Xeon w7-2575X supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon w7-2575X) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 7945HX). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon w7-2575X) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7945HX) — the Xeon w7-2575X offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel W790 (Xeon w7-2575X) and FL1 (Ryzen 9 7945HX).
| Feature | Xeon w7-2575X | Ryzen 9 7945HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB+3100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64+129% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Xeon w7-2575X) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7945HX). The Ryzen 9 7945HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Xeon w7-2575X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 7945HX targets Extreme Gaming / Mobile Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon w7-2575X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX; Ryzen 9 7945HX rivals Core i9-14900HX.
| Feature | Xeon w7-2575X | Ryzen 9 7945HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Extreme Gaming / Mobile Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















