
Xeon w7-3445 vs EPYC 4465P

Xeon w7-3445

EPYC 4465P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon w7-3445
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 4465P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon w7-3445 | EPYC 4465P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,596) | ✅ More affordable ($399) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Grado (2025) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon w7-3445 | EPYC 4465P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+567%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,596) | ✅ More affordable ($399) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon w7-3445 and EPYC 4465P

Xeon w7-3445
The Xeon w7-3445 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,991 points. Launch price was $1,989.

EPYC 4465P
The EPYC 4465P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,216 points. Launch price was $399.
Processing Power
The Xeon w7-3445 packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the EPYC 4465P offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon w7-3445 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3445 versus 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4465P — a 11.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 4465P (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Xeon w7-3445 uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 4465P uses Grado (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon w7-3445 scores 48,991 against the EPYC 4465P's 50,216 — a 2.5% lead for the EPYC 4465P. L3 cache: 52.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3445 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4465P.
| Feature | Xeon w7-3445 | EPYC 4465P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 40+67% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.4 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz+31% |
| L3 Cache | 52.5 MB | 64 MB (total)+22% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Grado (2025) |
| PassMark | 48,991 | 50,216+3% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon w7-3445 uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4465P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Xeon w7-3445 versus 5200 on the EPYC 4465P — the EPYC 4465P supports 8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-3445 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon w7-3445) vs 2 (EPYC 4465P). PCIe lanes: 112 (Xeon w7-3445) vs 28 (EPYC 4465P) — the Xeon w7-3445 offers 84 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: W790 (Xeon w7-3445) and AM5 (EPYC 4465P).
| Feature | Xeon w7-3445 | EPYC 4465P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 5200+8% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+3100% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 112+300% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w7-3445) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4465P). The EPYC 4465P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon w7-3445 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Xeon w7-3445 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX; EPYC 4465P rivals Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | Xeon w7-3445 | EPYC 4465P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Xeon w7-3445 launched at $1989 MSRP, while the EPYC 4465P debuted at $399. At current prices ($2596 vs $399), the EPYC 4465P is $2197 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon w7-3445 delivers 18.9 pts/$ vs 125.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 4465P — making the EPYC 4465P the 147.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon w7-3445 | EPYC 4465P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1989 | $399-80% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2596 | $399-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.9 | 125.9+566% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















