
Xeon w7-3445 vs EPYC Embedded 8224P

Xeon w7-3445

EPYC Embedded 8224P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon w7-3445
Performance Per Dollar EPYC Embedded 8224P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon w7-3445 | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,596) | ✅ More affordable ($1,048) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Siena (2023−2024) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon w7-3445 | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+147%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,596) | ✅ More affordable ($1,048) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon w7-3445 and EPYC Embedded 8224P

Xeon w7-3445
The Xeon w7-3445 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 48,991 points. Launch price was $1,989.

EPYC Embedded 8224P
The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon w7-3445 packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the EPYC Embedded 8224P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC Embedded 8224P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3445 versus 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3445 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.55 GHz). The Xeon w7-3445 uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon w7-3445 scores 48,991 against the EPYC Embedded 8224P's 48,869 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon w7-3445. L3 cache: 52.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3445 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC Embedded 8224P.
| Feature | Xeon w7-3445 | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 40 | 24 / 48+20% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+60% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+2% | 2.55 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 52.5 MB | 64 MB (total)+22% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 48,991 | 48,869 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon w7-3445 uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. The Xeon w7-3445 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1152 — 112.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon w7-3445) vs 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P). PCIe lanes: 112 (Xeon w7-3445) vs 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) — the Xeon w7-3445 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: W790 (Xeon w7-3445) and SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P).
| Feature | Xeon w7-3445 | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | SP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+256% | 1152 |
| RAM Channels | 8+33% | 6 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 112+17% | 96 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w7-3445 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w7-3445) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC Embedded 8224P). Direct competitor: Xeon w7-3445 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX; EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.
| Feature | Xeon w7-3445 | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Xeon w7-3445 launched at $1989 MSRP, while the EPYC Embedded 8224P debuted at $855. At current prices ($2596 vs $1048), the EPYC Embedded 8224P is $1548 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon w7-3445 delivers 18.9 pts/$ vs 46.6 pts/$ for the EPYC Embedded 8224P — making the EPYC Embedded 8224P the 84.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon w7-3445 | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1989 | $855-57% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2596 | $1048-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.9 | 46.6+147% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















