Xeon w7-3455
VS
Core Ultra 9 275HX

Xeon w7-3455 vs Core Ultra 9 275HX

Intel

Xeon w7-3455

24 Cores48 Thrd270 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 9 275HX

24 Cores24 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon w7-3455

#340
Xeon w7-3445
MSRP: $1989|Avg: $2596
112%
#341
EPYC 9275F
MSRP: $3439|Avg: $3439
112%
#342
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
MSRP: $3899|Avg: $3971.7
111%
#343
EPYC 7543P
MSRP: $2730|Avg: $115
111%
#344
EPYC 9455P
MSRP: $4819|Avg: $4366
110%
#345
EPYC 9274F
MSRP: $3060|Avg: $2490
110%
#346
Xeon Gold 6438Y+
MSRP: $2607|Avg: $389
109%
#348
Xeon Gold 6426Y
MSRP: $2145|Avg: N/A
107%
#349
EPYC 4565P
MSRP: $2730|Avg: $1980
106%
#351
Xeon W-2295
MSRP: $1333|Avg: $1400
105%
#352
Xeon 6741P
MSRP: $4421|Avg: $3780
103%
#353
EPYC 7452
MSRP: $2025|Avg: $2025
102%
#354
EPYC 7502P
MSRP: $2300|Avg: $1299
101%
#355
Xeon w7-3455
MSRP: $2489|Avg: $2625
100%
#356
EPYC 9334
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1810
99%
#357
Xeon w9-3575X
MSRP: $3789|Avg: $675
99%
#358
Xeon w7-3465X
MSRP: $2889|Avg: $468
98%
#359
Xeon Gold 6530
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $1846
98%
#359
EPYC 9354
MSRP: $3420|Avg: $2498
98%
#361
Xeon Silver 4114
MSRP: $612|Avg: $30
97%
#362
EPYC 7532
MSRP: $2380|Avg: $225
97%
#363
Xeon W-2191B
MSRP: $1333|Avg: $39
96%
#364
Xeon Gold 5320
MSRP: $1780|Avg: $1834
96%
#365
EPYC 7513
MSRP: $2840|Avg: $389
95%
#366
Xeon Silver 4216
MSRP: $1011|Avg: $800
94%
#367
EPYC 9454P
MSRP: $4598|Avg: $3333
93%
#369
Xeon Gold 6542Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
91%
#370
EPYC 7502
MSRP: $2600|Avg: $1299
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 275HX

#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
117%
#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
107%
#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
102%
#43
Core Ultra 9 275HX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
96%
#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($2,625) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon w7-3455 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon w7-3455Core Ultra 9 275HX
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($2,625)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-HX (2025) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 9 275HX ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($2,625 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon w7-3455Core Ultra 9 275HX
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($2,625)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon w7-3455 and Core Ultra 9 275HX

Intel

Xeon w7-3455

The Xeon w7-3455 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 67.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 54,925 points. Launch price was $2,489.

Intel

Core Ultra 9 275HX

The Core Ultra 9 275HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 56,018 points. Launch price was $600.

Processing Power

The Xeon w7-3455 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, matching the Core Ultra 9 275HX's 24 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3455 versus 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 275HX — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 275HX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Xeon w7-3455 uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 275HX uses Arrow Lake-HX (2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon w7-3455 scores 54,925 against the Core Ultra 9 275HX's 56,018 — a 2% lead for the Core Ultra 9 275HX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,900 vs 2,835, a 39.5% lead for the Core Ultra 9 275HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 17,908 (161.7% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 275HX). L3 cache: 67.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3455 vs 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 275HX.

FeatureXeon w7-3455Core Ultra 9 275HX
Cores / Threads
24 / 48
24 / 24
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz
5.4 GHz+13%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
2.7 GHz+8%
L3 Cache
67.5 MB+88%
36 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
3 MB (per core)+50%
Process
Intel 7 nm
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Arrow Lake-HX (2025)
PassMark
54,925
56,018+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,900
2,835+49%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
17,908+844%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon w7-3455 uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 9 275HX uses FCBGA2114 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Xeon w7-3455 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon w7-3455) vs 2 (Core Ultra 9 275HX). PCIe lanes: 112 (Xeon w7-3455) vs 24 (Core Ultra 9 275HX) — the Xeon w7-3455 offers 88 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel W790 (Xeon w7-3455) and HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 9 275HX).

FeatureXeon w7-3455Core Ultra 9 275HX
Socket
LGA4677
FCBGA2114
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB+1500%
256 GB
RAM Channels
8+300%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
112+367%
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Xeon w7-3455 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Xeon w7-3455) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 9 275HX). The Core Ultra 9 275HX includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the Xeon w7-3455 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 275HX targets High-End Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Xeon w7-3455 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX; Core Ultra 9 275HX rivals Ryzen 9 9955HX.

FeatureXeon w7-3455Core Ultra 9 275HX
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Intel Arc Graphics
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
High-End Gaming Laptop