
Xeon w7-3555

EPYC 8434P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon w7-3555
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 8434P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon w7-3555 | EPYC 8434P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($2,199) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,137) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Siena (2023−2024) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon w7-3555 | EPYC 8434P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+45%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($2,199) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,137) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon w7-3555 and EPYC 8434P

Xeon w7-3555
The Xeon w7-3555 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 75 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 325 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 67,754 points. Launch price was $2,339.

EPYC 8434P
The EPYC 8434P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 66,490 points. Launch price was $2,700.
Processing Power
The Xeon w7-3555 packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the EPYC 8434P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the EPYC 8434P has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3555 versus 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 8434P — a 43% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3555 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon w7-3555 uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 8434P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon w7-3555 scores 67,754 against the EPYC 8434P's 66,490 — a 1.9% lead for the Xeon w7-3555. L3 cache: 75 MB on the Xeon w7-3555 vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8434P.
| Feature | Xeon w7-3555 | EPYC 8434P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 28 / 56 | 48 / 96+71% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+55% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+8% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 75 MB | 128 MB (total)+71% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 67,754+2% | 66,490 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,300 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,120 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon w7-3555 uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 8434P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3555 versus 4800 on the EPYC 8434P — the EPYC 8434P supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-3555 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1152 — 112.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon w7-3555) vs 6 (EPYC 8434P). PCIe lanes: 112 (Xeon w7-3555) vs 96 (EPYC 8434P) — the Xeon w7-3555 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: W790 (Xeon w7-3555) and SP6 (EPYC 8434P).
| Feature | Xeon w7-3555 | EPYC 8434P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | SP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | 4800+95900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+372826922% | 1152 |
| RAM Channels | 8+33% | 6 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 112+17% | 96 |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w7-3555 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Xeon w7-3555) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 8434P). Direct competitor: Xeon w7-3555 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX; EPYC 8434P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.
| Feature | Xeon w7-3555 | EPYC 8434P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Xeon w7-3555 launched at $2749 MSRP, while the EPYC 8434P debuted at $1517. At current prices ($2199 vs $3137), the Xeon w7-3555 is $938 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon w7-3555 delivers 30.8 pts/$ vs 21.2 pts/$ for the EPYC 8434P — making the Xeon w7-3555 the 37% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon w7-3555 | EPYC 8434P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2749 | $1517-45% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2199-30% | $3137 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.8+45% | 21.2 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.


















