
Xeon X3440 vs Core 2 Duo P8700

Xeon X3440

Core 2 Duo P8700
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X3440 is positioned at rank 782 and the Core 2 Duo P8700 is on rank 140, so the Core 2 Duo P8700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X3440
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo P8700
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon X3440 | Core 2 Duo P8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($16) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($85) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon X3440 | Core 2 Duo P8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+424%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($16) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($85) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X3440 and Core 2 Duo P8700

Xeon X3440
The Xeon X3440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 2,769 points. Launch price was $215.

Core 2 Duo P8700
The Core 2 Duo P8700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,805 points. Launch price was $209.
Processing Power
The Xeon X3440 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core 2 Duo P8700 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Xeon X3440 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.93 GHz on the Xeon X3440 versus 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P8700 — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Xeon X3440 (base: 2.53 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Xeon X3440 uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo P8700 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon X3440 scores 2,769 against the Core 2 Duo P8700's 2,805 — a 1.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo P8700. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon X3440 vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P8700.
| Feature | Xeon X3440 | Core 2 Duo P8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.93 GHz+16% | 2.53 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.53 GHz | 2.53 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+167% | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 3 MB+1100% |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Lynnfield (2009−2010) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,769 | 2,805+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon X3440 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo P8700 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon X3440 | Core 2 Duo P8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1156 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 8 |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon X3440) / true (Core 2 Duo P8700). Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo P8700 rivals Turion II Ultra M600.
| Feature | Xeon X3440 | Core 2 Duo P8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
The Xeon X3440 launched at $215 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo P8700 debuted at $241. At current prices ($16 vs $85), the Xeon X3440 is $69 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon X3440 delivers 173.1 pts/$ vs 33.0 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo P8700 — making the Xeon X3440 the 135.9% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon X3440 | Core 2 Duo P8700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $215-11% | $241 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $16-81% | $85 |
| Performance per Dollar | 173.1+425% | 33.0 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















