Xeon X3470
VS
Core i5-2500S

Xeon X3470 vs Core i5-2500S

Intel

Xeon X3470

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Core i5-2500S

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X3470 is positioned at rank 976 and the Core i5-2500S is on rank 854, so the Core i5-2500S offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X3470

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
36653%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
6920%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
6149%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4750%
#536
Xeon W-3265M
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $3500
99%
#976
Xeon X3470
MSRP: $589|Avg: $16
100%
#979
Xeon E5-2689
MSRP: $1800|Avg: $18
97%
#980
Xeon E5-2450L
MSRP: $1106|Avg: $78
96%
#981
Xeon X3480
MSRP: $612|Avg: $48
96%
#982
Xeon E5-2687W
MSRP: $1885|Avg: $70
94%
#983
Xeon E5-4610
MSRP: $1219|Avg: $50
93%
#985
Xeon X7550
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $1400
93%
#986
Xeon E7540
MSRP: $1980|Avg: $146
92%
#987
Xeon E7530
MSRP: $1391|Avg: $146
92%
#988
Xeon E5-4627 v4
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $200
92%
#989
Xeon E5-4627 v3
MSRP: $2225|Avg: $200
90%
#990
Xeon X5660
MSRP: $1219|Avg: $10
86%
#991
Xeon E5-2667
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $31
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2500S

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17741%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16764%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12172%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3667%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2905%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2541%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1455%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1436%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1308%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1308%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1293%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1258%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1241%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1236%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1224%
#854
Core i5-2500S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
100%
#855
Athlon X2 BE-2400
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
100%
#857
Core i3-2102
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
99%
#858
Pentium G850
MSRP: $86|Avg: $75
99%
#859
Core i5-3475S
MSRP: $249|Avg: $42
99%
#860
Core i7-2600K
MSRP: $317|Avg: $109
98%
#861
Pentium G860
MSRP: $86|Avg: $36
98%
#862
Athlon II X2 245
MSRP: $66|Avg: $15
98%
#863
Core i7-2700K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $45
98%
#865
Core i5-4670K
MSRP: $328|Avg: $200
97%
#866
Core i5-3330S
MSRP: $231|Avg: $30
96%
#867
Celeron G465
MSRP: $70|Avg: $37
96%
#868
Athlon II X4 630
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
96%
#869
A6-7400K
MSRP: $101|Avg: $43
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($16) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X3470 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon X3470Core i5-2500S
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($16)
⚠️ Higher cost ($61)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-2500S ($61), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($45 less, 281% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon X3470Core i5-2500S
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+278%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($16)
⚠️ Higher cost ($61)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X3470 and Core i5-2500S

Intel

Xeon X3470

The Xeon X3470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,341 points. Launch price was $589.

Intel

Core i5-2500S

The Core i5-2500S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,373 points. Launch price was $75.

Processing Power

The Xeon X3470 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i5-2500S's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon X3470 versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-2500S — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-2500S (base: 2.93 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Xeon X3470 uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-2500S uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon X3470 scores 3,341 against the Core i5-2500S's 3,373 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-2500S. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon X3470 vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2500S.

FeatureXeon X3470Core i5-2500S
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz+3%
Base Clock
2.93 GHz+9%
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+33%
6144 kB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,341
3,373
Geekbench 6 Single
600
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon X3470 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-2500S uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon X3470Core i5-2500S
Socket
LGA1156
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon X3470) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2500S). The Core i5-2500S includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2000), while the Xeon X3470 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2500S targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-2500S rivals Phenom II X4 980.

FeatureXeon X3470Core i5-2500S
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 2000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Legacy Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon X3470 launched at $589 MSRP, while the Core i5-2500S debuted at $192. At current prices ($16 vs $61), the Xeon X3470 is $45 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon X3470 delivers 208.8 pts/$ vs 55.3 pts/$ for the Core i5-2500S — making the Xeon X3470 the 116.3% better value option.

FeatureXeon X3470Core i5-2500S
MSRP
$589
$192-67%
Avg Price (30d)
$16-74%
$61
Performance per Dollar
208.8+278%
55.3
Release Date
2009
2011