Xeon X3470
VS
FX-4150

Xeon X3470 vs FX-4150

Intel

Xeon X3470

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2009
VS
AMD

FX-4150

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 4 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X3470 is positioned at rank 976 and the FX-4150 is on rank 702, so the FX-4150 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X3470

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
36653%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
6920%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
6149%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4750%
#536
Xeon W-3265M
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $3500
99%
#976
Xeon X3470
MSRP: $589|Avg: $16
100%
#979
Xeon E5-2689
MSRP: $1800|Avg: $18
97%
#980
Xeon E5-2450L
MSRP: $1106|Avg: $78
96%
#981
Xeon X3480
MSRP: $612|Avg: $48
96%
#982
Xeon E5-2687W
MSRP: $1885|Avg: $70
94%
#983
Xeon E5-4610
MSRP: $1219|Avg: $50
93%
#985
Xeon X7550
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $1400
93%
#986
Xeon E7540
MSRP: $1980|Avg: $146
92%
#987
Xeon E7530
MSRP: $1391|Avg: $146
92%
#988
Xeon E5-4627 v4
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $200
92%
#989
Xeon E5-4627 v3
MSRP: $2225|Avg: $200
90%
#990
Xeon X5660
MSRP: $1219|Avg: $10
86%
#991
Xeon E5-2667
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $31
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar FX-4150

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12838%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12131%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8808%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2654%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2102%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1839%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1053%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1039%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
946%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
946%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
936%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
910%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
898%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
894%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
886%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
98%
#702
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
100%
#703
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
99%
#704
Core i5-4690T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $98
99%
#705
Core i5-4430S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $90
99%
#706
Core i5-4440S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
99%
#709
Core i3-4360T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
98%
#711
Core i5-3470S
MSRP: $184|Avg: $37
98%
#712
Core i5-4670T
MSRP: $189|Avg: $35
98%
#713
Core i5-2400S
MSRP: $135|Avg: $10
97%
#714
Pentium G3420
MSRP: $86|Avg: $40
97%
#715
Core i5-6500
MSRP: $239|Avg: $123
96%
#716
Core i7-4770T
MSRP: $250|Avg: $39
96%
#717
Core i3-4340
MSRP: $149|Avg: $50
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($16) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X3470 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon X3470FX-4150
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($16)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-4150 ($20), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($4 less, 25% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon X3470FX-4150
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+26%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($16)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X3470 and FX-4150

Intel

Xeon X3470

The Xeon X3470 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,341 points. Launch price was $589.

AMD

FX-4150

The FX-4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,327 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Xeon X3470 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the FX-4150's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon X3470 versus 4 GHz on the FX-4150 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the FX-4150 (base: 2.93 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Xeon X3470 uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the FX-4150 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon X3470 scores 3,341 against the FX-4150's 3,327 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon X3470. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureXeon X3470FX-4150
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
4 GHz+11%
Base Clock
2.93 GHz
3.8 GHz+30%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
4 MB+1500%
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark
3,341
3,327
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon X3470 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the FX-4150 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon X3470FX-4150
Socket
LGA1156
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon X3470 launched at $589 MSRP, while the FX-4150 debuted at $137. At current prices ($16 vs $20), the Xeon X3470 is $4 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon X3470 delivers 208.8 pts/$ vs 166.3 pts/$ for the FX-4150 — making the Xeon X3470 the 22.6% better value option.

FeatureXeon X3470FX-4150
MSRP
$589
$137-77%
Avg Price (30d)
$16-20%
$20
Performance per Dollar
208.8+26%
166.3
Release Date
2009
2012