Xeon X3480
VS
A10 PRO-7800B

Xeon X3480 vs A10 PRO-7800B

Intel

Xeon X3480

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.73 GHz2010
VS
AMD

A10 PRO-7800B

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X3480 is positioned at rank 981 and the A10 PRO-7800B is on rank 320, so the A10 PRO-7800B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X3480

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
38203%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
7213%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
6408%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4951%
#981
Xeon X3480
MSRP: $612|Avg: $48
100%
#982
Xeon E5-2687W
MSRP: $1885|Avg: $70
98%
#983
Xeon E5-4610
MSRP: $1219|Avg: $50
97%
#985
Xeon X7550
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $1400
97%
#986
Xeon E7540
MSRP: $1980|Avg: $146
96%
#987
Xeon E7530
MSRP: $1391|Avg: $146
96%
#988
Xeon E5-4627 v4
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $200
95%
#989
Xeon E5-4627 v3
MSRP: $2225|Avg: $200
94%
#990
Xeon X5660
MSRP: $1219|Avg: $10
90%
#991
Xeon E5-2667
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $31
88%
#992
Xeon E5-2690
MSRP: $2057|Avg: $150
87%
#993
Xeon E3-1565L v5
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $120
87%
#994
Xeon L5640
MSRP: $996|Avg: N/A
86%
#995
Xeon E5-4627 v2
MSRP: $2061|Avg: $70
84%
#996
Xeon L5335
MSRP: $380|Avg: $18
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A10 PRO-7800B

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4699%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4440%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3224%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
971%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
769%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
673%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
385%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
380%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
346%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
346%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
342%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
333%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
329%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
327%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
324%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
100%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
100%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
100%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
100%
#293
Core i3-10300
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $140.49
100%
#294
Core i9-10900F
MSRP: $464|Avg: $300
99%
#295
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
MSRP: $449|Avg: $429
99%
#296
Core i7-9700F
MSRP: $323|Avg: $200
99%
#297
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1419
99%
#298
Core i5-9500F
MSRP: $187|Avg: $154
98%
#299
Core i9-11900KB
MSRP: $539|Avg: $350
98%
#300
Core i7-10700F
MSRP: $310|Avg: $250
97%
#320
A10 PRO-7800B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($48) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X3480 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon X3480A10 PRO-7800B
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($48)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A10 PRO-7800B ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($48 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon X3480A10 PRO-7800B
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($48)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X3480 and A10 PRO-7800B

Intel

Xeon X3480

The Xeon X3480 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.73 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,327 points. Launch price was $612.

AMD

A10 PRO-7800B

The A10 PRO-7800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,317 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Xeon X3480 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the A10 PRO-7800B's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.73 GHz on the Xeon X3480 versus 3.9 GHz on the A10 PRO-7800B — a 4.5% clock advantage for the A10 PRO-7800B (base: 3.06 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon X3480 uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the A10 PRO-7800B uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon X3480 scores 3,327 against the A10 PRO-7800B's 3,317 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon X3480.

FeatureXeon X3480A10 PRO-7800B
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.73 GHz
3.9 GHz+5%
Base Clock
3.06 GHz
3.5 GHz+14%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
4096 kB+1500%
Process
45 nm
28 nm-38%
Architecture
Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Kaveri (2014−2015)
PassMark
3,327
3,317
Geekbench 6 Single
446
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon X3480 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A10 PRO-7800B uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon X3480A10 PRO-7800B
Socket
LGA1156
FM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-2133
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon X3480) / AMD-V (A10 PRO-7800B). The A10 PRO-7800B includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Xeon X3480 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 PRO-7800B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: A10 PRO-7800B rivals Core i3-4160.

FeatureXeon X3480A10 PRO-7800B
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Business Desktop