
Xeon X3480 vs FX-9830P

Xeon X3480

FX-9830P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X3480 is positioned at rank 981 and the FX-9830P is on rank 835, so the FX-9830P offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X3480
Performance Per Dollar FX-9830P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon X3480 | FX-9830P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($48) | ✅ More affordable ($45) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Lynnfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon X3480 | FX-9830P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($48) | ✅ More affordable ($45) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X3480 and FX-9830P

Xeon X3480
The Xeon X3480 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.73 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,327 points. Launch price was $612.

FX-9830P
The FX-9830P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per module). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,298 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Xeon X3480 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the FX-9830P's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.73 GHz on the Xeon X3480 versus 3.7 GHz on the FX-9830P — a 0.8% clock advantage for the Xeon X3480 (base: 3.06 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon X3480 uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the FX-9830P uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon X3480 scores 3,327 against the FX-9830P's 3,298 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon X3480.
| Feature | Xeon X3480 | FX-9830P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.73 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.06 GHz+2% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per module)+300% |
| Process | 45 nm | 28 nm-38% |
| Architecture | Lynnfield (2009−2010) | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 3,327 | 3,298 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon X3480 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the FX-9830P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon X3480 | FX-9830P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1156 | FP4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
Value Analysis
The Xeon X3480 launched at $612 MSRP, while the FX-9830P debuted at $150. At current prices ($48 vs $45), the FX-9830P is $3 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon X3480 delivers 69.3 pts/$ vs 73.3 pts/$ for the FX-9830P — making the FX-9830P the 5.6% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon X3480 | FX-9830P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $612 | $150-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $48 | $45-6% |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.3 | 73.3+6% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















