Xeon X5260
VS
Celeron Dual-Core T3500

Xeon X5260 vs Celeron Dual-Core T3500

VS
Intel

Celeron Dual-Core T3500

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X5260 is positioned at rank 956 and the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is on rank 959, so the Xeon X5260 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5260

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
32523%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
6141%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
5456%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4215%
#529
Xeon Max 9480
MSRP: $12980|Avg: $12980
100%
#530
Xeon E5-2689 v4
MSRP: $2723|Avg: $100
98%
#531
EPYC 7543
MSRP: $10257|Avg: $468
96%
#532
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
MSRP: $7719|Avg: $7719
95%
#533
Xeon Gold 6250
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $2000
95%
#534
Xeon E5-2699 v4
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $400
94%
#956
Xeon X5260
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#957
Xeon E5-4650 v2
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $48
99%
#958
Xeon E5-1620 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $160
98%
#962
Xeon E5-2660
MSRP: $1329|Avg: $65
95%
#963
Xeon E5-2667 v3
MSRP: $2057|Avg: $150
95%
#965
Xeon E3110
MSRP: $214|Avg: $158
95%
#968
Xeon L3406
MSRP: $189|Avg: $30
91%
#969
Xeon E5-2687W v2
MSRP: $2112|Avg: $62
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron Dual-Core T3500

#947
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1841%
#948
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1814%
#949
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1665%
#950
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1657%
#951
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1642%
#953
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1586%
#954
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1521%
#955
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1518%
#956
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1477%
#959
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#960
Celeron 4305UE
MSRP: $107|Avg: $107
100%
#963
Core i7-10510U
MSRP: $409|Avg: N/A
98%
#968
Core i7-4710MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
96%
#970
Celeron T3100
MSRP: $62|Avg: $62
96%
#971
Core i7-4800MQ
MSRP: $380|Avg: $378
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X5260 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon X5260Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron Dual-Core T3500 ($15), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($15 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon X5260Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X5260 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500

Intel

Xeon X5260

The Xeon X5260 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,278 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Celeron Dual-Core T3500

The Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,275 points. Launch price was $80.

Processing Power

The Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is built on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon X5260 scores 1,278 against the Celeron Dual-Core T3500's 1,275 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon X5260.

FeatureXeon X5260Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.1 GHz
Base Clock
3.33 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
1 MB
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,278
1,275
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon X5260 uses the LGA771 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon X5260Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Socket
LGA771
P
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
800
Max RAM Capacity
8
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon X5260) / false (Celeron Dual-Core T3500). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T3500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T3500 rivals Pentium T4400.

FeatureXeon X5260Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false
Target Use
Budget