Xeon X5260
VS
Celeron E3500

Xeon X5260 vs Celeron E3500

VS
Intel

Celeron E3500

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X5260 is positioned at rank 956 and the Celeron E3500 is on rank 778, so the Celeron E3500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5260

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
32523%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
6141%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
5456%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4215%
#529
Xeon Max 9480
MSRP: $12980|Avg: $12980
100%
#530
Xeon E5-2689 v4
MSRP: $2723|Avg: $100
98%
#531
EPYC 7543
MSRP: $10257|Avg: $468
96%
#532
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
MSRP: $7719|Avg: $7719
95%
#533
Xeon Gold 6250
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $2000
95%
#534
Xeon E5-2699 v4
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $400
94%
#956
Xeon X5260
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#957
Xeon E5-4650 v2
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $48
99%
#958
Xeon E5-1620 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $160
98%
#962
Xeon E5-2660
MSRP: $1329|Avg: $65
95%
#963
Xeon E5-2667 v3
MSRP: $2057|Avg: $150
95%
#965
Xeon E3110
MSRP: $214|Avg: $158
95%
#968
Xeon L3406
MSRP: $189|Avg: $30
91%
#969
Xeon E5-2687W v2
MSRP: $2112|Avg: $62
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron E3500

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14979%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14154%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10277%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3096%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2452%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2145%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1229%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1213%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1104%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1104%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1092%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1062%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1047%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1043%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1034%
#393
Core i3-9300T
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
98%
#778
Celeron E3500
MSRP: $62|Avg: $10
100%
#779
Pentium G2030
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
100%
#780
Athlon II X2 260
MSRP: $60|Avg: $12
100%
#781
Athlon II X3 445
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
100%
#783
Core i5-2310
MSRP: $177|Avg: $12
99%
#784
Core i5-5675C
MSRP: $276|Avg: $66
99%
#785
Core i5-2380P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $25
99%
#786
Core i5-4690
MSRP: $272|Avg: $120
99%
#787
FX-6120
MSRP: $188|Avg: $54
98%
#788
Core i7-6700TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $175
98%
#789
Athlon II X4 620
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
98%
#791
Core i7-3820
MSRP: $286|Avg: $30
97%
#792
Athlon II X3 425
MSRP: $79|Avg: $5
97%
#793
Athlon II X2 255
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X5260 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon X5260Celeron E3500
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron E3500 ($10), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($10 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon X5260Celeron E3500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X5260 and Celeron E3500

Intel

Xeon X5260

The Xeon X5260 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,278 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Celeron E3500

The Celeron E3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,290 points. Launch price was $62.

Processing Power

The Celeron E3500 is built on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon X5260 scores 1,278 against the Celeron E3500's 1,290 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron E3500. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5260 vs 0 kB on the Celeron E3500.

FeatureXeon X5260Celeron E3500
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.33 GHz+23%
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB L2 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,278
1,290
Geekbench 6 Single
347
Geekbench 6 Multi
624
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon X5260 uses the LGA771 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron E3500 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon X5260Celeron E3500
Socket
LGA771
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon X5260) / VT-x (Celeron E3500). Primary use case: Celeron E3500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E3500 rivals Pentium E5200.

FeatureXeon X5260Celeron E3500
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget