Xeon X5355 vs Celeron G3900E
Xeon X5355
Celeron G3900E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X5355 is positioned at rank 1032 and the Celeron G3900E is on rank 816, so the Celeron G3900E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5355
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G3900E
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon X5355 | Celeron G3900E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,000) | ✅ More affordable ($35) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Clovertown (2006−2007) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon X5355 | Celeron G3900E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+11301%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,000) | ✅ More affordable ($35) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X5355 and Celeron G3900E
Xeon X5355
The Xeon X5355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 November 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,039 points. Launch price was $1,172.
Celeron G3900E
The Celeron G3900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,034 points. Launch price was $107.
Processing Power
The Xeon X5355 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G3900E offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Xeon X5355 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.67 GHz on the Xeon X5355 versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G3900E — a 112.7% clock advantage for the Celeron G3900E. The Xeon X5355 uses the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron G3900E uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon X5355 scores 2,039 against the Celeron G3900E's 2,034 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon X5355. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5355 vs 2 MB on the Celeron G3900E.
| Feature | Xeon X5355 | Celeron G3900E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 0.67 GHz | 2.4 GHz+258% |
| Base Clock | 2.66 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB L2 Cache+300% | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (total)+700% | 512 kB |
| Process | 65 nm | 14 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Clovertown (2006−2007) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 2,039 | 2,034 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 699 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 948 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon X5355) / VT-x (Celeron G3900E). The Celeron G3900E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 510), while the Xeon X5355 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3900E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3900E rivals Pentium G4400.
| Feature | Xeon X5355 | Celeron G3900E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 510 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Xeon X5355 launched at $4491 MSRP, while the Celeron G3900E debuted at $107. At current prices ($4000 vs $35), the Celeron G3900E is $3965 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon X5355 delivers 0.5 pts/$ vs 58.1 pts/$ for the Celeron G3900E — making the Celeron G3900E the 196.5% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon X5355 | Celeron G3900E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4491 | $107-98% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4000 | $35-99% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.5 | 58.1+11520% |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon X5355 and Celeron G3900E
