Xeon X5355
VS
Celeron N4505

Xeon X5355 vs Celeron N4505

Intel

Xeon X5355

4 Cores4 Thrd120 WWMax: 0.67 GHz2006
VS
Intel

Celeron N4505

2 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon X5355 is positioned at rank #1032 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5355

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
461829%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
87198%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
77471%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
59849%
#1032
Xeon X5355
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4000
100%
#1033
Xeon E5420
MSRP: $7214|Avg: $6500
62%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N4505 (2021) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon X5355Celeron N4505
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($4,000)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Clovertown (2006−2007) / 65 nm)
✨ Modern (Jasper Lake (2021) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon X5355 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and **DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon X5355Celeron N4505
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($4,000)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X5355 and Celeron N4505

Intel

Xeon X5355

The Xeon X5355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 November 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,039 points. Launch price was $1,172.

Intel

Celeron N4505

The Celeron N4505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,037 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Xeon X5355 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron N4505 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Xeon X5355 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.67 GHz on the Xeon X5355 versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N4505 — a 124.9% clock advantage for the Celeron N4505 (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon X5355 uses the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron N4505 uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon X5355 scores 2,039 against the Celeron N4505's 2,037 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon X5355. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5355 vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron N4505.

FeatureXeon X5355Celeron N4505
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
0.67 GHz
2.9 GHz+333%
Base Clock
2.66 GHz+33%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB L2 Cache+100%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4 MB (total)+167%
1.5 MB (total)
Process
65 nm
10 nm-85%
Architecture
Clovertown (2006−2007)
Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark
2,039
2,037
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon X5355 uses the LGA771 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N4505 uses BGA1338 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon X5355Celeron N4505
Socket
LGA771
BGA1338
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 4.0+100%