Xeon X5560
VS
A10-9700E

Xeon X5560 vs A10-9700E

Intel

Xeon X5560

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2009
VS
AMD

A10-9700E

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X5560 is positioned at rank 687 and the A10-9700E is on rank 391, so the A10-9700E offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5560

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
12860%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2428%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2157%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1667%
#402
EPYC 9475F
MSRP: $7592|Avg: $7592
100%
#403
Xeon Gold 6554S
MSRP: $3157|Avg: $2836
100%
#405
Xeon 6737P
MSRP: $4995|Avg: $4995
99%
#406
Xeon Gold 6342
MSRP: $2977|Avg: $3000
98%
#407
Xeon Gold 6438N
MSRP: $3351|Avg: $3351
97%
#408
Xeon 6747P
MSRP: $6497|Avg: $6497
97%
#410
Xeon W-3175X
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $2999
95%
#687
Xeon X5560
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#691
Xeon E5-1650 v2
MSRP: $583|Avg: $60
99%
#697
Xeon E3-1275 v2
MSRP: $426|Avg: $426
97%
#699
Xeon E5-2658
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A10-9700E

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5754%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5437%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3948%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1189%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
942%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
824%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
472%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
466%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
424%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
424%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
419%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
408%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
402%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
401%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
397%
#333
Core i9-9920X
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $464
99%
#334
Core i3-9100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $125
97%
#335
Core i9-10900X
MSRP: $590|Avg: $425
97%
#391
A10-9700E
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#392
A10-7860K
MSRP: $117|Avg: N/A
100%
#393
Athlon X4 845
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
99%
#395
Celeron G3930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $25
99%
#396
Ryzen 3 1300X
MSRP: $129|Avg: $54
99%
#400
Phenom II X3 710
MSRP: $125|Avg: N/A
98%
#402
A10-7700K
MSRP: $152|Avg: N/A
98%
#403
Celeron G3930TE
MSRP: $42|Avg: $29
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A10-9700E (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon X5560A10-9700E
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Gainestown (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon X5560 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon X5560A10-9700E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X5560 and A10-9700E

Intel

Xeon X5560

The Xeon X5560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,231 points. Launch price was $44.

AMD

A10-9700E

The A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,250 points. Launch price was $130.

Processing Power

The Xeon X5560 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the A10-9700E's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon X5560 versus 3.5 GHz on the A10-9700E — a 9% clock advantage for the A10-9700E (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon X5560 uses the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the A10-9700E uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon X5560 scores 3,231 against the A10-9700E's 3,250 — a 0.6% lead for the A10-9700E. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon X5560 vs 0 kB on the A10-9700E.

FeatureXeon X5560A10-9700E
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.5 GHz+9%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3 GHz+7%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
2048 kB+700%
Process
45 nm
28 nm-38%
Architecture
Gainestown (2009−2010)
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
3,231
3,250
Geekbench 6 Single
600
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon X5560 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A10-9700E uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5560 versus DDR4-2400 on the A10-9700E — the A10-9700E supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 3 (Xeon X5560) vs 2 (A10-9700E). Chipset compatibility: Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5560) and A320,B350,X370 (A10-9700E).

FeatureXeon X5560A10-9700E
Socket
LGA1366
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
3+50%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5560) vs AMD-V (A10-9700E). The A10-9700E includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Xeon X5560 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon X5560 targets Workstation, A10-9700E targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Xeon X5560 rivals Core i3-2100; A10-9700E rivals Pentium G4560T.

FeatureXeon X5560A10-9700E
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Workstation
Low Power