Xeon X5560
VS
Core i7-950

Xeon X5560 vs Core i7-950

Intel

Xeon X5560

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Core i7-950

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.33 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X5560 is positioned at rank 687 and the Core i7-950 is on rank 1067, so the Xeon X5560 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5560

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
12860%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2428%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2157%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1667%
#402
EPYC 9475F
MSRP: $7592|Avg: $7592
100%
#403
Xeon Gold 6554S
MSRP: $3157|Avg: $2836
100%
#405
Xeon 6737P
MSRP: $4995|Avg: $4995
99%
#406
Xeon Gold 6342
MSRP: $2977|Avg: $3000
98%
#407
Xeon Gold 6438N
MSRP: $3351|Avg: $3351
97%
#408
Xeon 6747P
MSRP: $6497|Avg: $6497
97%
#410
Xeon W-3175X
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $2999
95%
#687
Xeon X5560
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#691
Xeon E5-1650 v2
MSRP: $583|Avg: $60
99%
#697
Xeon E3-1275 v2
MSRP: $426|Avg: $426
97%
#699
Xeon E5-2658
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-950

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
53930%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
50958%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
37000%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
11147%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
8829%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
7724%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
4424%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
4366%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3975%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3975%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3931%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3825%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3771%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3756%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3722%
#1067
Core i7-950
MSRP: $562|Avg: $15
100%
#1068
Sempron 3100+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $15
99%
#1069
Athlon II X4 635
MSRP: $400|Avg: $250
97%
#1070
Core 2 Duo E6750
MSRP: $183|Avg: $15
97%
#1071
Core i7-940
MSRP: $562|Avg: $90
93%
#1072
Celeron 2.40
MSRP: $69|Avg: $13
87%
#1073
Sempron 2800+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $29
85%
#1074
Athlon 64 3100+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
82%
#1075
Sempron 3600+
MSRP: $105|Avg: $20
80%
#1076
Celeron 2.80
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
74%
#1077
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
MSRP: $450|Avg: $20
70%
#1078
Athlon 64 3600+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $15
69%
#1079
Core 2 Quad Q6700
MSRP: $530|Avg: $50
68%
#1080
Athlon 64 2600+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
68%
#1081
Celeron 2.20
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
67%
#1082
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $15
62%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X5560 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon X5560Core i7-950
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Gainestown (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-950 ($15), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($15 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon X5560Core i7-950
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X5560 and Core i7-950

Intel

Xeon X5560

The Xeon X5560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,231 points. Launch price was $44.

Intel

Core i7-950

The Core i7-950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,250 points. Launch price was $290.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon X5560 and Core i7-950 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon X5560 versus 3.33 GHz on the Core i7-950 — a 4% clock advantage for the Core i7-950 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The Xeon X5560 uses the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i7-950 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon X5560 scores 3,231 against the Core i7-950's 3,250 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-950. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureXeon X5560Core i7-950
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.33 GHz+4%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3.06 GHz+9%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Gainestown (2009−2010)
Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark
3,231
3,250
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA1366 socket with PCIe 2.0.

FeatureXeon X5560Core i7-950
Socket
LGA1366
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
RAM Channels
3
ECC Support
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5560) / not specified (Core i7-950). Primary use case: Xeon X5560 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5560 rivals Core i3-2100.

FeatureXeon X5560Core i7-950
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Workstation