Xeon X5667
VS
Core i5-3570S

Xeon X5667 vs Core i5-3570S

Intel

Xeon X5667

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.46 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core i5-3570S

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X5667 is positioned at rank 579 and the Core i5-3570S is on rank 751, so the Xeon X5667 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5667

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
8847%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1670%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1484%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1147%
#349
EPYC 4565P
MSRP: $2730|Avg: $1980
100%
#351
Xeon W-2295
MSRP: $1333|Avg: $1400
99%
#352
Xeon 6741P
MSRP: $4421|Avg: $3780
97%
#353
EPYC 7452
MSRP: $2025|Avg: $2025
96%
#354
EPYC 7502P
MSRP: $2300|Avg: $1299
95%
#579
Xeon X5667
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#583
Xeon E3-1245 v2
MSRP: $273|Avg: $204
99%
#590
Xeon W-2125
MSRP: $444|Avg: $42
96%
#592
EPYC 7261
MSRP: $501|Avg: $8
95%
#594
Xeon E5-1620 v2
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-3570S

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14169%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13388%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9721%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2929%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2320%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2029%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1162%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1147%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1044%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1044%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1033%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1005%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
991%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
987%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
978%
#751
Core i5-3570S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $59
100%
#752
Core i7-3770
MSRP: $294|Avg: $60
99%
#753
Pentium G2120
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
99%
#754
Core i5-3340S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $25
99%
#755
Celeron G1101
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
99%
#756
FX-8150
MSRP: $245|Avg: $50
99%
#757
Pentium G3240
MSRP: $89|Avg: $126
99%
#758
Core i5-3550S
MSRP: $205|Avg: $100
99%
#759
FX-8140
MSRP: $225|Avg: $120
98%
#760
Athlon X2 450
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
98%
#761
Athlon II X3 450
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
97%
#762
Core i7-4790
MSRP: $339|Avg: $60
97%
#763
Pentium G640
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
97%
#764
Pentium G840
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
97%
#766
Core i5-6440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X5667 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon X5667Core i5-3570S
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($59)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-3570S ($59), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($59 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon X5667Core i5-3570S
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($59)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X5667 and Core i5-3570S

Intel

Xeon X5667

The Xeon X5667 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,697 points. Launch price was $80.

Intel

Core i5-3570S

The Core i5-3570S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,686 points. Launch price was $285.

Processing Power

The Xeon X5667 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i5-3570S's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.46 GHz on the Xeon X5667 versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-3570S — a 9.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-3570S (base: 3.06 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Xeon X5667 uses the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-3570S uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon X5667 scores 4,697 against the Core i5-3570S's 4,686 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon X5667. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5667 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-3570S.

FeatureXeon X5667Core i5-3570S
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.46 GHz
3.8 GHz+10%
Base Clock
3.06 GHz
3.1 GHz+1%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+100%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
4,697
4,686
Geekbench 6 Single
663
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon X5667 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-3570S uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Memory channels: 3 (Xeon X5667) vs 2 (Core i5-3570S). Chipset compatibility: Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5667) and H61,B75,H77,Z75,Z77 (Core i5-3570S).

FeatureXeon X5667Core i5-3570S
Socket
LGA1366
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
3+50%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Core i5-3570S includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2500), while the Xeon X5667 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon X5667 targets Workstation, Core i5-3570S targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Xeon X5667 rivals Core i7-980X; Core i5-3570S rivals A10-5800K.

FeatureXeon X5667Core i5-3570S
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 2500
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Workstation
Legacy Desktop