Xeon X5667
VS
N200

Xeon X5667 vs N200

Intel

Xeon X5667

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.46 GHz2010
VS
Intel

N200

4 Cores4 Thrd6 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X5667 is positioned at rank 579 and the N200 is on rank 137, so the N200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5667

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
8847%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1670%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1484%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1147%
#349
EPYC 4565P
MSRP: $2730|Avg: $1980
100%
#351
Xeon W-2295
MSRP: $1333|Avg: $1400
99%
#352
Xeon 6741P
MSRP: $4421|Avg: $3780
97%
#353
EPYC 7452
MSRP: $2025|Avg: $2025
96%
#354
EPYC 7502P
MSRP: $2300|Avg: $1299
95%
#579
Xeon X5667
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#583
Xeon E3-1245 v2
MSRP: $273|Avg: $204
99%
#590
Xeon W-2125
MSRP: $444|Avg: $42
96%
#592
EPYC 7261
MSRP: $501|Avg: $8
95%
#594
Xeon E5-1620 v2
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar N200

#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
98%
#125
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
310%
#126
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
306%
#127
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
281%
#128
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
279%
#129
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
277%
#131
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
267%
#132
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
256%
#133
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
256%
#134
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
249%
#137
N200
MSRP: $193|Avg: N/A
100%
#138
Core 2 Duo SP9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
100%
#140
Core 2 Duo P8700
MSRP: $241|Avg: $85
99%
#147
Atom N2800
MSRP: $47|Avg: $3
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The N200 (2023) utilizes Intel 7 nm technology and DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon X5667N200
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($193)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Legacy / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon X5667 (2010) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon X5667N200
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($193)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X5667 and N200

Intel

Xeon X5667

The Xeon X5667 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,697 points. Launch price was $80.

Intel

N200

The N200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 4,729 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Xeon X5667 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the N200's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.46 GHz on the Xeon X5667 versus 3.7 GHz on the N200 — a 6.7% clock advantage for the N200. The Xeon X5667 is built on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon X5667 scores 4,697 against the N200's 4,729 — a 0.7% lead for the N200. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5667 vs 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the N200.

FeatureXeon X5667N200
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.46 GHz
3.7 GHz+7%
Base Clock
3.06 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+100%
6 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
Intel 7 nm-78%
Architecture
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark
4,697
4,729
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon X5667 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the N200 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon X5667N200
Socket
LGA1366
FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
RAM Channels
3
ECC Support
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5667) / not specified (N200). Primary use case: Xeon X5667 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5667 rivals Core i7-980X.

FeatureXeon X5667N200
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Workstation