CPU
GPU
Xeon X5680
Ryzen 3 1300X
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X5680 is positioned at rank 704 and the Ryzen 3 1300X is on rank 396, so the Ryzen 3 1300X offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5680
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 3 1300X
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon X5680 | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($13) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($54) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon X5680 | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+315%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($13) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($54) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X5680 and Ryzen 3 1300X
Xeon X5680
The Xeon X5680 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,910 points. Launch price was $172.
Ryzen 3 1300X
The Ryzen 3 1300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,923 points. Launch price was $129.
Processing Power
The Xeon X5680 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 1300X offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon X5680 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon X5680 versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 1300X — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 1300X (base: 3.33 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Xeon X5680 uses the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 3 1300X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon X5680 scores 6,910 against the Ryzen 3 1300X's 6,923 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 3 1300X. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5680 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 1300X.
| Feature | Xeon X5680 | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.33 GHz | 3.4 GHz+2% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 6,910 | 6,923 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 3,486 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,120 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,155 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon X5680 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 3 1300X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5680 versus DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen 3 1300X — the Ryzen 3 1300X supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 3 (Xeon X5680) vs 2 (Ryzen 3 1300X). Chipset compatibility: Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5680) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,X570 (Ryzen 3 1300X).
| Feature | Xeon X5680 | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1366 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR4-2666+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 3+50% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 3 1300X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5680) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 3 1300X). Primary use case: Xeon X5680 targets Workstation, Ryzen 3 1300X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Xeon X5680 rivals Core i7-980X.
| Feature | Xeon X5680 | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Workstation | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Xeon X5680 launched at $450 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 1300X debuted at $129. At current prices ($13 vs $54), the Xeon X5680 is $41 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon X5680 delivers 531.5 pts/$ vs 128.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 1300X — making the Xeon X5680 the 122.3% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon X5680 | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450 | $129-71% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $13-76% | $54 |
| Performance per Dollar | 531.5+315% | 128.2 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon X5680 and Ryzen 3 1300X
