Xeon X5698
VS
Core i3-9100HL

Xeon X5698 vs Core i3-9100HL

Intel

Xeon X5698

2 Cores4 Thrd130 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i3-9100HL

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon X5698 is positioned at rank #659 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5698

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
12055%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2276%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2022%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1562%
#388
EPYC 9254
MSRP: $3761|Avg: $1099
99%
#389
Xeon Gold 5220R
MSRP: $1780|Avg: $1015
99%
#390
EPYC 9555P
MSRP: $7983|Avg: $6130
98%
#391
Xeon Gold 5218
MSRP: $1273|Avg: $500
98%
#392
EPYC 9374F
MSRP: $4850|Avg: $3466
98%
#393
Xeon Gold 6448Y
MSRP: $3583|Avg: N/A
98%
#394
EPYC 9454
MSRP: $5225|Avg: $576
98%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $1000
97%
#396
Xeon Platinum 8461V
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
97%
#659
Xeon X5698
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#669
Xeon E5645
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
98%
#670
Xeon X5672
MSRP: $300|Avg: $44
97%
#671
Xeon E5-4603
MSRP: $202|Avg: $80
97%
#674
Xeon E3-1265L v4
MSRP: $417|Avg: $80
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-9100HL

#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
127%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
127%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
126%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
125%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
125%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
124%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
124%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
120%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
120%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
113%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
113%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
111%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
108%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
105%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
103%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
100%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
100%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
96%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
95%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
94%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
88%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
82%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
81%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
81%
#386
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
80%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
78%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
76%
#389
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $5200
76%
#390
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $1247
74%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
69%
#392
Celeron G4920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $115
64%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-9100HL (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon X5698Core i3-9100HL
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon X5698 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon X5698Core i3-9100HL
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X5698 and Core i3-9100HL

Intel

Xeon X5698

The Xeon X5698 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,447 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core i3-9100HL

The Core i3-9100HL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 3,454 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Xeon X5698 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-9100HL offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i3-9100HL has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Xeon X5698 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i3-9100HL — a 41.1% clock advantage for the Xeon X5698 (base: 4.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Xeon X5698 uses the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-9100HL uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon X5698 scores 3,447 against the Core i3-9100HL's 3,454 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-9100HL. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total) on the Xeon X5698 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9100HL.

FeatureXeon X5698Core i3-9100HL
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+52%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
4.4 GHz+175%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
12288 kB (total)+100%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark
3,447
3,454
Geekbench 6 Single
1,037
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,373
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon X5698 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-9100HL uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5698 versus DDR4 2666 MHz on the Core i3-9100HL — the Core i3-9100HL supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 3 (Xeon X5698) vs 2 (Core i3-9100HL). Chipset compatibility: Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5698) and Intel 300 Series (Core i3-9100HL).

FeatureXeon X5698Core i3-9100HL
Socket
LGA1366
BGA1440
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR4 2666 MHz+33%
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
3+50%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5698) vs true (Core i3-9100HL). The Core i3-9100HL includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon X5698 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon X5698 targets Workstation, Core i3-9100HL targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Xeon X5698 rivals Core i7-980X.

FeatureXeon X5698Core i3-9100HL
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
true
Target Use
Workstation
Embedded