Xeon X5698
VS
Phenom II X6 1065T

Xeon X5698 vs Phenom II X6 1065T

Intel

Xeon X5698

2 Cores4 Thrd130 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2011
VS
AMD

Phenom II X6 1065T

6 Cores6 Thrd125 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X5698 is positioned at rank 659 and the Phenom II X6 1065T is on rank 1030, so the Xeon X5698 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5698

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
12055%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2276%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2022%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1562%
#388
EPYC 9254
MSRP: $3761|Avg: $1099
99%
#389
Xeon Gold 5220R
MSRP: $1780|Avg: $1015
99%
#390
EPYC 9555P
MSRP: $7983|Avg: $6130
98%
#391
Xeon Gold 5218
MSRP: $1273|Avg: $500
98%
#392
EPYC 9374F
MSRP: $4850|Avg: $3466
98%
#393
Xeon Gold 6448Y
MSRP: $3583|Avg: N/A
98%
#394
EPYC 9454
MSRP: $5225|Avg: $576
98%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $1000
97%
#396
Xeon Platinum 8461V
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
97%
#659
Xeon X5698
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#669
Xeon E5645
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
98%
#670
Xeon X5672
MSRP: $300|Avg: $44
97%
#671
Xeon E5-4603
MSRP: $202|Avg: $80
97%
#674
Xeon E3-1265L v4
MSRP: $417|Avg: $80
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X6 1065T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
38916%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
36772%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
26699%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8043%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6371%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5574%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3192%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3151%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2869%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2868%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2836%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2760%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2721%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2710%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2686%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
96%
#1030
Phenom II X6 1065T
MSRP: $426|Avg: $170
100%
#1031
Celeron 440
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
100%
#1032
A8-3820
MSRP: $280|Avg: $200
97%
#1033
Core i7-860S
MSRP: $299|Avg: $96
97%
#1035
Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
95%
#1036
PRO A10-8770E
MSRP: $395|Avg: $210
95%
#1037
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP: $230|Avg: $20
95%
#1038
Phenom II X2 B53
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
95%
#1039
Core 2 Quad Q9300
MSRP: $266|Avg: $27
94%
#1040
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
94%
#1041
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
94%
#1043
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
93%
#1044
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
91%
#1045
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X5698 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon X5698Phenom II X6 1065T
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($170)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Thuban (2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Phenom II X6 1065T ($170), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($170 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon X5698Phenom II X6 1065T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($170)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X5698 and Phenom II X6 1065T

Intel

Xeon X5698

The Xeon X5698 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,447 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

Phenom II X6 1065T

The Phenom II X6 1065T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thuban (2010) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,412 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Xeon X5698 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X6 1065T offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Phenom II X6 1065T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Xeon X5698 versus 3.4 GHz on the Phenom II X6 1065T — a 25.6% clock advantage for the Xeon X5698 (base: 4.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon X5698 uses the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Phenom II X6 1065T uses Thuban (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon X5698 scores 3,447 against the Phenom II X6 1065T's 3,412 — a 1% lead for the Xeon X5698. L3 cache: 12288 kB (total) on the Xeon X5698 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X6 1065T.

FeatureXeon X5698Phenom II X6 1065T
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
6 / 6+200%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+29%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
4.4 GHz+52%
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
12288 kB (total)+100%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Thuban (2010)
PassMark
3,447+1%
3,412
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon X5698 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Phenom II X6 1065T uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon X5698Phenom II X6 1065T
Socket
LGA1366
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
RAM Channels
3
ECC Support
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5698) / not specified (Phenom II X6 1065T). Primary use case: Xeon X5698 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5698 rivals Core i7-980X.

FeatureXeon X5698Phenom II X6 1065T
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Workstation