Xeon X6550
VS
Core 2 Quad Q8300

Xeon X6550 vs Core 2 Quad Q8300

Intel

Xeon X6550

8 Cores16 Thrd130 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core 2 Quad Q8300

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X6550 is positioned at rank 879 and the Core 2 Quad Q8300 is on rank 985, so the Xeon X6550 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X6550

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
21469%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
4054%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3601%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2782%
#494
EPYC 9184X
MSRP: $4928|Avg: $3750
100%
#495
Xeon Platinum 8470
MSRP: $9359|Avg: $9359
99%
#496
Xeon E7-8857 v2
MSRP: $3838|Avg: $2995
98%
#497
Xeon Gold 6148
MSRP: $3072|Avg: $290
98%
#498
Xeon E5-1681 V3
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $200
96%
#499
Xeon W-3275
MSRP: $4449|Avg: $1550
96%
#500
Xeon Gold 6138
MSRP: $2612|Avg: $300
95%
#501
Xeon E5-2690 v4
MSRP: $2090|Avg: $389
95%
#502
Xeon Platinum 8362
MSRP: $6236|Avg: $5740
94%
#879
Xeon X6550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#881
Xeon E5-2430L
MSRP: $551|Avg: $250
99%
#886
Xeon X3460
MSRP: $316|Avg: $25
97%
#893
Xeon E5502
MSRP: $188|Avg: $39
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q8300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
29105%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
27501%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
19968%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
6016%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4765%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4168%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2387%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2356%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2145%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2145%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2121%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2064%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2035%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2027%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2009%
#304
Core i7-6950X
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $180
95%
#985
Core 2 Quad Q8300
MSRP: $179|Avg: $10
100%
#986
Core i7-860
MSRP: $284|Avg: $30
99%
#987
Core i7-870
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
99%
#988
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
MSRP: $136|Avg: $42
98%
#989
Core i3-6102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
97%
#990
Pentium Dual-Core E2160
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
97%
#991
Pentium Dual-Core E2210
MSRP: $98|Avg: $15
96%
#992
Core 2 Duo E7500
MSRP: $113|Avg: $10
96%
#993
Core 2 Quad Q9505
MSRP: $213|Avg: $150
95%
#996
Core i7-930
MSRP: $294|Avg: $20
95%
#997
Core i7-920
MSRP: $284|Avg: $79
94%
#998
Core i7-4960X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $136
94%
#999
Pentium Dual-Core E2200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X6550 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon X6550Core 2 Quad Q8300
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Quad Q8300 ($10), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($10 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon X6550Core 2 Quad Q8300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X6550 and Core 2 Quad Q8300

Intel

Xeon X6550

The Xeon X6550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB L3 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1567. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,936 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q8300

The Core 2 Quad Q8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,917 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Xeon X6550 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon X6550 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Xeon X6550 versus 2.5 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q8300 — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Core 2 Quad Q8300 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q8300 is built on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon X6550 scores 1,936 against the Core 2 Quad Q8300's 1,917 — a 1% lead for the Xeon X6550. L3 cache: 18 MB L3 Cache on the Xeon X6550 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Quad Q8300.

FeatureXeon X6550Core 2 Quad Q8300
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+100%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz+4%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache
18 MB L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
4 MB (total)
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Yorkfield (2007−2009)
PassMark
1,936
1,917
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon X6550 uses the LGA1567 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core 2 Quad Q8300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon X6550Core 2 Quad Q8300
Socket
LGA1567
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+355%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X6550) / not specified (Core 2 Quad Q8300). Primary use case: Xeon X6550 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon X6550 rivals Core i7-980X.

FeatureXeon X6550Core 2 Quad Q8300
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Server