Xeon X6550
VS
Core i5-2410M

Xeon X6550 vs Core i5-2410M

Intel

Xeon X6550

8 Cores16 Thrd130 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core i5-2410M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X6550 is positioned at rank 879 and the Core i5-2410M is on rank 1113, so the Xeon X6550 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X6550

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
21469%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
4054%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3601%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2782%
#494
EPYC 9184X
MSRP: $4928|Avg: $3750
100%
#495
Xeon Platinum 8470
MSRP: $9359|Avg: $9359
99%
#496
Xeon E7-8857 v2
MSRP: $3838|Avg: $2995
98%
#497
Xeon Gold 6148
MSRP: $3072|Avg: $290
98%
#498
Xeon E5-1681 V3
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $200
96%
#499
Xeon W-3275
MSRP: $4449|Avg: $1550
96%
#500
Xeon Gold 6138
MSRP: $2612|Avg: $300
95%
#501
Xeon E5-2690 v4
MSRP: $2090|Avg: $389
95%
#502
Xeon Platinum 8362
MSRP: $6236|Avg: $5740
94%
#879
Xeon X6550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#881
Xeon E5-2430L
MSRP: $551|Avg: $250
99%
#886
Xeon X3460
MSRP: $316|Avg: $25
97%
#893
Xeon E5502
MSRP: $188|Avg: $39
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2410M

#1101
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3380%
#1102
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3331%
#1103
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3058%
#1104
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3044%
#1105
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3016%
#1107
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2912%
#1108
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2793%
#1109
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2788%
#1110
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2713%
#1113
Core i5-2410M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
100%
#1114
Pentium T2370
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
100%
#1115
Pentium N3710
MSRP: $161|Avg: $50
99%
#1116
Core m3-7Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1117
Pentium 977
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1118
Core i7-2715QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $50
98%
#1120
VIA Nano U2250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#1121
Core i5-560M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
96%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
95%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
95%
#1127
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
95%
#1128
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon X6550 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon X6550Core i5-2410M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-2410M ($225), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($225 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon X6550Core i5-2410M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X6550 and Core i5-2410M

Intel

Xeon X6550

The Xeon X6550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB L3 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1567. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,936 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core i5-2410M

The Core i5-2410M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,954 points. Launch price was $225.

Processing Power

The Xeon X6550 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i5-2410M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon X6550 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Xeon X6550 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i5-2410M — a 18.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-2410M (base: 2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-2410M is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon X6550 scores 1,936 against the Core i5-2410M's 1,954 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-2410M. L3 cache: 18 MB L3 Cache on the Xeon X6550 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2410M.

FeatureXeon X6550Core i5-2410M
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+300%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
2.9 GHz+21%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.3 GHz+15%
L3 Cache
18 MB L3 Cache+500%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,936
1,954
Geekbench 6 Single
444
Geekbench 6 Multi
913
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon X6550 uses the LGA1567 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-2410M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X6550 versus 1333 on the Core i5-2410M — the Core i5-2410M supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon X6550) vs 2 (Core i5-2410M). Chipset compatibility: Nehalem-EX (Xeon X6550) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i5-2410M).

FeatureXeon X6550Core i5-2410M
Socket
LGA1567
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+150%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
1333+44333%
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X6550) vs true (Core i5-2410M). The Core i5-2410M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Xeon X6550 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon X6550 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon X6550 rivals Core i7-980X; Core i5-2410M rivals AMD A8-3500M.

FeatureXeon X6550Core i5-2410M
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
true
Target Use
Server