Xeon X7350 vs Xeon E5-2620 v3
Xeon X7350
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon X7350 is positioned at rank 248 and the Xeon E5-2620 v3 is on rank 643, so the Xeon X7350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X7350
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2620 v3
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon X7350 | Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($80) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Tigerton (2007) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon X7350 | Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($80) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X7350 and Xeon E5-2620 v3
Xeon X7350
The Xeon X7350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 September 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Tigerton (2007) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,836 points. Launch price was $2,301.
Xeon E5-2620 v3
The Xeon E5-2620 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 7,734 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon X7350 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, matching the Xeon E5-2620 v3's 6 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.93 GHz on the Xeon X7350 versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 v3 — a 109.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2620 v3 (base: 2.93 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon X7350 uses the Tigerton (2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Xeon E5-2620 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon X7350 scores 7,836 against the Xeon E5-2620 v3's 7,734 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon X7350. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X7350 vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2620 v3.
| Feature | Xeon X7350 | Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 0.93 GHz | 3.2 GHz+244% |
| Base Clock | 2.93 GHz+22% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB L2 Cache | 15 MB (total)+88% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (total)+1500% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 22 nm-66% |
| Architecture | Tigerton (2007) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 7,836+1% | 7,734 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon X7350 uses the PGA604 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-2620 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Xeon X7350 versus DDR4-1866 on the Xeon E5-2620 v3 — the Xeon E5-2620 v3 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: Intel 7300 (Xeon X7350) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2620 v3).
| Feature | Xeon X7350 | Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA604 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR4-1866+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 4 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 40 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon E5-2620 v3 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x (Xeon X7350) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2620 v3). Primary use case: Xeon X7350 targets Server, Xeon E5-2620 v3 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon X7350 rivals Core i3-2100.
| Feature | Xeon X7350 | Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Server | Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon X7350 and Xeon E5-2620 v3
