Xeon X7350 vs Core i3-10105T
Xeon X7350
Core i3-10105T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon X7350 is positioned at rank #248 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon X7350
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-10105T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon X7350 | Core i3-10105T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($122) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Tigerton (2007) / 65 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake-R (2021) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon X7350 | Core i3-10105T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($122) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon X7350 and Core i3-10105T
Xeon X7350
The Xeon X7350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 September 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Tigerton (2007) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,836 points. Launch price was $2,301.
Core i3-10105T
The Core i3-10105T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-R (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 7,815 points. Launch price was $134.
Processing Power
The Xeon X7350 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Core i3-10105T offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon X7350 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.93 GHz on the Xeon X7350 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i3-10105T — a 123% clock advantage for the Core i3-10105T (base: 2.93 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon X7350 uses the Tigerton (2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i3-10105T uses Comet Lake-R (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon X7350 scores 7,836 against the Core i3-10105T's 7,815 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon X7350. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X7350 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10105T.
| Feature | Xeon X7350 | Core i3-10105T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 0.93 GHz | 3.9 GHz+319% |
| Base Clock | 2.93 GHz | 3 GHz+2% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB L2 Cache+33% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (total)+1500% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 14 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Tigerton (2007) | Comet Lake-R (2021) |
| PassMark | 7,836 | 7,815 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,200 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 4,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon X7350 uses the PGA604 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-10105T uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Xeon X7350 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i3-10105T — the Core i3-10105T supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon X7350) vs 2 (Core i3-10105T). Chipset compatibility: Intel 7300 (Xeon X7350) and H410,B460,H470,Q470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Q570,Z590 (Core i3-10105T).
| Feature | Xeon X7350 | Core i3-10105T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA604 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR4-2666+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x (Xeon X7350) vs Yes (Core i3-10105T). The Core i3-10105T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon X7350 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon X7350 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon X7350 rivals Core i3-2100.
| Feature | Xeon X7350 | Core i3-10105T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | Yes |
| Target Use | Server | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon X7350 and Core i3-10105T
