Z-01 vs Athlon XP 2000+
Z-01
Athlon XP 2000+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Z-01 is positioned at rank 1221 and the Athlon XP 2000+ is on rank 1136, so the Athlon XP 2000+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Z-01
Performance Per Dollar Athlon XP 2000+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Z-01 | Athlon XP 2000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Desna (2011) / 40 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Thorton (2001−2003) / 180 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Z-01 | Athlon XP 2000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+241%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Z-01 and Athlon XP 2000+
Z-01
The Z-01 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Desna (2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 215 points. Launch price was $69.
Athlon XP 2000+
The Athlon XP 2000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2002 (23 years ago). It is based on the Thorton (2001−2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 180 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 252 points. Launch price was $25.
Processing Power
The Z-01 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon XP 2000+ offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Z-01 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the Z-01 versus 1.67 GHz on the Athlon XP 2000+ — a 50.2% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 2000+. The Z-01 uses the Desna (2011) architecture (40 nm), while the Athlon XP 2000+ uses Thorton (2001−2003) (180 nm). In PassMark, the Z-01 scores 215 against the Athlon XP 2000+'s 252 — a 15.8% lead for the Athlon XP 2000+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Z-01 | Athlon XP 2000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1 GHz | 1.67 GHz+67% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 256 kB |
| Process | 40 nm-78% | 180 nm |
| Architecture | Desna (2011) | Thorton (2001−2003) |
| PassMark | 215 | 252+17% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 100 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 180 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Z-01 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon XP 2000+ uses A (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Z-01 versus DDR1-266 on the Athlon XP 2000+ — the Z-01 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Z-01) vs 0 (Athlon XP 2000+) — the Z-01 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Desna (Z-01) and VIA KT133A,nForce2 (Athlon XP 2000+).
| Feature | Z-01 | Athlon XP 2000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT1 | A |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066+200% | DDR1-266 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon XP 2000+ has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Z-01) vs None (Athlon XP 2000+). The Z-01 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6250), while the Athlon XP 2000+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Z-01 targets Tablet/Netbook.
| Feature | Z-01 | Athlon XP 2000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 6250 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | None |
| Target Use | Tablet/Netbook | — |
Value Analysis
The Z-01 launched at $50 MSRP, while the Athlon XP 2000+ debuted at $339. At current prices ($10 vs $40), the Z-01 is $30 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Z-01 delivers 21.5 pts/$ vs 6.3 pts/$ for the Athlon XP 2000+ — making the Z-01 the 109.4% better value option.
| Feature | Z-01 | Athlon XP 2000+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-85% | $339 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-75% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.5+241% | 6.3 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2002 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Z-01 and Athlon XP 2000+
