Z-01
VS
Pentium III 1400S

Z-01 vs Pentium III 1400S

AMD

Z-01

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 1 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Pentium III 1400S

1 Cores1 Thrd32 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2002

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Z-01 is positioned at rank 1221 and the Pentium III 1400S is on rank 1128, so the Pentium III 1400S offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Z-01

#1209
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
6823%
#1210
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
6723%
#1211
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
6172%
#1212
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
6144%
#1213
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
6088%
#1215
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
5879%
#1216
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
5637%
#1217
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
5628%
#1218
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
5477%
#1221
Z-01
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#1222
Pentium T2310
MSRP: $150|Avg: $14
97%
#1223
Celeron SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
95%
#1224
Core i5-560UM
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
94%
#1225
Core i7-660UM
MSRP: $317|Avg: N/A
94%
#1226
C-30
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
93%
#1228
Core i7-620UM
MSRP: $278|Avg: N/A
91%
#1230
Celeron 570
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
88%
#1231
Core i7-820QM
MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A
77%
#1233
Core Duo T2700
MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A
65%
#1235
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
55%
#1236
Core Solo T1400
MSRP: $200|Avg: $5
50%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium III 1400S

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
342544%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
323670%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
235011%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
70799%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
56080%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
49059%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
28099%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
27732%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
25251%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
25248%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
24966%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
24292%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
23953%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
23856%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
23640%
#1126
Pentium III 1400
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
100%
#1127
Pentium 4 2.60
MSRP: $401|Avg: $25
100%
#1128
Pentium III 1400S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
100%
#1129
Athlon XP 1800+
MSRP: $252|Avg: $30
98%
#1130
Athlon XP 1900+
MSRP: $269|Avg: $20
97%
#1131
Athlon 64 FX-51
MSRP: $733|Avg: $733
92%
#1132
Athlon 64 FX-55
MSRP: $827|Avg: $50
91%
#1133
Athlon 64 FX-53
MSRP: $799|Avg: $15
89%
#1134
Athlon XP 2000+
MSRP: $339|Avg: $40
81%
#1135
Athlon 64 FX-57
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $200
77%
#1136
Athlon XP 3000+
MSRP: $588|Avg: $20
76%
#1137
Athlon XP 2100+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $30
69%
#1138
Pentium III 1266S
MSRP: $369|Avg: $20
63%
#1139
Pentium 4 1.80
MSRP: $562|Avg: $40
44%
#1140
Pentium III 1133
MSRP: $990|Avg: $30
20%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Z-01 (2011) utilizes 40 nm technology and **DDR3 Single-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightZ-01Pentium III 1400S
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Desna (2011) / 40 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Tualatin (2000−2002) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium III 1400S (2002) relies on 130 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightZ-01Pentium III 1400S
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+2257%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($250)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Z-01 and Pentium III 1400S

AMD

Z-01

The Z-01 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Desna (2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 215 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium III 1400S

The Pentium III 1400S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tualatin (2000−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA370. Thermal design power (TDP): 32 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 228 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Z-01 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium III 1400S offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Z-01 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the Z-01 versus 1.4 GHz on the Pentium III 1400S — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Pentium III 1400S. The Z-01 uses the Desna (2011) architecture (40 nm), while the Pentium III 1400S uses Tualatin (2000−2002) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Z-01 scores 215 against the Pentium III 1400S's 228 — a 5.9% lead for the Pentium III 1400S. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureZ-01Pentium III 1400S
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1 GHz
1.4 GHz+40%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512 kB
Process
40 nm-69%
130 nm
Architecture
Desna (2011)
Tualatin (2000−2002)
PassMark
215
228+6%
Geekbench 6 Single
100
Geekbench 6 Multi
180
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Z-01 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium III 1400S uses PGA370 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Z-01 versus PC133 on the Pentium III 1400S — the Pentium III 1400S supports 191.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Z-01) vs 0 (Pentium III 1400S) — the Z-01 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Desna (Z-01) and Intel 815,VIA Apollo Pro 133T (Pentium III 1400S).

FeatureZ-01Pentium III 1400S
Socket
FT1
PGA370
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
PC133+4333%
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (Z-01) vs No (Pentium III 1400S). The Z-01 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6250), while the Pentium III 1400S requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Z-01 targets Tablet/Netbook.

FeatureZ-01Pentium III 1400S
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6250
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
No
Target Use
Tablet/Netbook
💰

Value Analysis

The Z-01 launched at $50 MSRP, while the Pentium III 1400S debuted at $250. At current prices ($10 vs $250), the Z-01 is $240 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Z-01 delivers 21.5 pts/$ vs 0.9 pts/$ for the Pentium III 1400S — making the Z-01 the 183.7% better value option.

FeatureZ-01Pentium III 1400S
MSRP
$50-80%
$250
Avg Price (30d)
$10-96%
$250
Performance per Dollar
21.5+2289%
0.9
Release Date
2011
2002