CPU
GPU
A10-5800K
Celeron J4125
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The A10-5800K is positioned at rank #430 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10-5800K
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A10-5800K | Celeron J4125 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A10-5800K | Celeron J4125 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10-5800K and Celeron J4125
A10-5800K
The A10-5800K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,963 points. Launch price was $122.
Celeron J4125
The Celeron J4125 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,936 points. Launch price was $107.
Processing Power
Both the A10-5800K and Celeron J4125 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the A10-5800K versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron J4125 — a 43.5% clock advantage for the A10-5800K (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A10-5800K uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron J4125 uses Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5800K scores 2,963 against the Celeron J4125's 2,936 — a 0.9% lead for the A10-5800K. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5800K vs 4 MB on the Celeron J4125.
| Feature | A10-5800K | Celeron J4125 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+56% | 2.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+90% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 4 MB (total)+300% |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Trinity (2012−2013) | Gemini Lake Refresh (2019) |
| PassMark | 2,963 | 2,936 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 461 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A10-5800K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron J4125 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-5800K versus 2400 on the Celeron J4125 — the Celeron J4125 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-5800K supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-5800K) vs 6 (Celeron J4125) — the A10-5800K offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A75,A78,A85X,A88X (A10-5800K) and BGA1090 (Celeron J4125).
| Feature | A10-5800K | Celeron J4125 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | FCBGA1090 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | 2400+79900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+419430300% | 8 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+167% | 6 |
Advanced Features
Only the A10-5800K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-5800K) vs true (Celeron J4125). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7660D (A10-5800K) and Intel UHD Graphics 600 (Celeron J4125) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5800K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-5800K rivals Core i3-3225; Celeron J4125 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1305G.
| Feature | A10-5800K | Celeron J4125 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 7660D | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A10-5800K and Celeron J4125
