A10-5800K vs Core i5-3380M

AMD

A10-5800K

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-3380M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

A10-5800K vs Core i5-3380M Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-5800K vs Core i5-3380M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-5800K vs Core i5-3380M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-5800K

2012

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 100W instead of 512W, a 412W reduction.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-3380M.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i5-3380M

2013

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-5800K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (2,938 vs 2,963).
    • 412% higher power demand at 512W vs 100W.
    • No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-5800K.

    Quick Answers

    So, is A10-5800K better than Core i5-3380M?
    Yes. A10-5800K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, A10-5800K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-5800K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    A10-5800K still makes the most sense overall. A10-5800K comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i5-3380M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    A10-5800K vs Core i5-3380M Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    A10-5800K

    The A10-5800K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,963 points. Launch price was $122.

    Intel

    Core i5-3380M

    The Core i5-3380M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,938 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    The A10-5800K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-3380M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-5800K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the A10-5800K versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-3380M — a 15.4% clock advantage for the A10-5800K (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A10-5800K uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-3380M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-5800K scores 2,963 against the Core i5-3380M's 2,938 — a 0.8% lead for the A10-5800K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 461 vs 700, a 41.2% lead for the Core i5-3380M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-5800K vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3380M.

    FeatureA10-5800KCore i5-3380M
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 4+100%
    2 / 4
    Boost Clock
    4.2 GHz+17%
    3.6 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.8 GHz+31%
    2.9 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    3 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    1 MB (per core)
    256K (per core)+25500%
    Process
    32 nm
    22 nm-31%
    Architecture
    Trinity (2012−2013)
    Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
    PassMark
    2,963
    2,938
    Geekbench 6 Single
    461
    700+52%
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    1,600
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The A10-5800K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-3380M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-5800K versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-3380M — the A10-5800K supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A75,A78,A85X,A88X (A10-5800K) and HM77,QM77 (Core i5-3380M).

    FeatureA10-5800KCore i5-3380M
    Socket
    FM2
    PGA988
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 3.0+50%
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1866+17%
    DDR3-1600
    Max RAM Capacity
    32 GB
    32 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Only the A10-5800K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-5800K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-3380M). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 7660D (A10-5800K) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3380M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5800K targets Budget, Core i5-3380M targets Business Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-5800K rivals Core i3-3225; Core i5-3380M rivals AMD A10-4600M.

    FeatureA10-5800KCore i5-3380M
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Radeon HD 7660D
    Intel HD Graphics 4000
    Unlocked
    Yes
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    No
    Virtualization
    AMD-V
    VT-x, VT-d
    Target Use
    Budget
    Business Laptop