
A10-6790K

Ryzen 5 3600
A10-6790K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A10-6790K vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A10-6790K vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A10-6790K
2013Why buy it
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8670D, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,112 vs 17,685).
- ❌53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +181.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while A10-6790K mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A10-6790K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than A10-6790K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10-6790K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6790K
The A10-6790K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 3,112 points. Launch price was $130.


Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The A10-6790K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the A10-6790K versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 2.4% clock advantage for the A10-6790K (base: 4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The A10-6790K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6790K scores 3,112 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 140.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 412 vs 1,295, a 103.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-6790K vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | A10-6790K | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+2% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+11% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+700% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Richland (2013−2014) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 3,112 | 17,685+468% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 412 | 1,295+214% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The A10-6790K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-6790K versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 71.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-6790K) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A85X,A88X (A10-6790K) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).
| Feature | A10-6790K | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | DDR4-3200+71% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-6790K) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). The A10-6790K includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8670D), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6790K targets Budget, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: A10-6790K rivals Core i3-4340; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | A10-6790K | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8670D | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | Yes |
| Target Use | Budget | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













