
A10-6790K

Ryzen 7 3700X
A10-6790K vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A10-6790K vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A10-6790K vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A10-6790K
2013Why buy it
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8670D, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 3700X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,112 vs 22,430).
- ❌53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +243.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while A10-6790K mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A10-6790K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-6790K.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than A10-6790K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10-6790K vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-6790K
The A10-6790K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 3,112 points. Launch price was $130.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The A10-6790K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the A10-6790K versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The A10-6790K uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the A10-6790K scores 3,112 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 151.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-6790K vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | A10-6790K | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+11% | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+700% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Richland (2013−2014) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 3,112 | 22,430+621% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 412 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A10-6790K uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-6790K versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 71.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-6790K) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A85X,A88X (A10-6790K) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | A10-6790K | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | DDR4-3200+71% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-6790K) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The A10-6790K includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8670D), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-6790K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-6790K rivals Core i3-4340.
| Feature | A10-6790K | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8670D | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













