
A10-7400P

Core i5-12400F
A10-7400P vs Core i5-12400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A10-7400P vs Core i5-12400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A10-7400P vs Core i5-12400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A10-7400P
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R6, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,134 vs 19,532).
- ❌Older platform position on FP3, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +311.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FP3 and older memory support.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike A10-7400P.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while A10-7400P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A10-7400P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than A10-7400P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10-7400P vs Core i5-12400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-7400P
The A10-7400P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,134 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.
Processing Power
The A10-7400P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-12400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A10-7400P versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F — a 25.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A10-7400P uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-12400F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7400P scores 2,134 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 160.6% lead for the Core i5-12400F.
| Feature | A10-7400P | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz+29% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+220% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | Intel 7 nm-75% |
| Architecture | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 2,134 | 19,532+815% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 12,380 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 657 |
Memory & Platform
The A10-7400P uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-7400P versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F — the Core i5-12400F supports 157.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-7400P) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) — the Core i5-12400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP3 (A10-7400P) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).
| Feature | A10-7400P | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP3 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+157% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 128 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-7400P) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). The A10-7400P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7400P targets Laptop, Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: A10-7400P rivals Core i5-4200U; Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | A10-7400P | Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R6 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Laptop | Gaming Performance/Value |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















