A10-7850K vs Core i3-4150

A10-7850K vs Core i3-4150 Performance Spectrum

A10-7850K

4 / 4

3,394

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4150

2 / 4

3,406

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-7850K vs Core i3-4150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-7850K vs Core i3-4150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-7850K

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (510 vs 1,071).
❌Lower PassMark (3,394 vs 3,406).
❌75.9% higher power demand at 95W vs 54W.

Core i3-4150

2014

Why buy it

✅+110% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 54W instead of 95W, a 41W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while A10-7850K mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4150 better than A10-7850K?

Yes. Core i3-4150 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4150 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4150 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4150 is the better buy right now. Core i3-4150 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $281 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4150 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

A10-7850K vs Core i3-4150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-7850K

The A10-7850K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,394 points. Launch price was $173.

Core i3-4150

The Core i3-4150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,406 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-7850K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4150 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-7850K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A10-7850K versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-4150 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the A10-7850K (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The A10-7850K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-4150 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7850K scores 3,394 against the Core i3-4150's 3,406 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-4150. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 510 vs 1,071, a 71% lead for the Core i3-4150 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-7850K vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4150.

Feature	A10-7850K	Core i3-4150
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4 GHz+14%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+6%	3.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256K (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Godaveri (2014−2016)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,394	3,406
Geekbench 6 Single	510	1,071+110%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7850K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4150 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10-7850K versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4150 — the A10-7850K supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A10-7850K) and H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4150).

Feature	A10-7850K	Core i3-4150
Socket	FM2+	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133+33%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A10-7850K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-7850K) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4150). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R7 (A10-7850K) and HD Graphics 4400 (Core i3-4150) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7850K targets Budget, Core i3-4150 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A10-7850K rivals Core i3-4340; Core i3-4150 rivals FX-6300.