A10-7850K vs Core i7-880

AMD

A10-7850K

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 4 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-880

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.73 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

A10-7850K vs Core i7-880 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-7850K vs Core i7-880 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-7850K vs Core i7-880: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-7850K

2014

Why buy it

  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Core i7-880 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-880 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (3,394 vs 3,429).

Core i7-880

2010

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $583 MSRP, while A10-7850K mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • No integrated graphics, while A10-7850K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-880 better than A10-7850K?
Yes. Core i7-880 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-880 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-880 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-880 is the better buy right now. Core i7-880 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $583 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10-7850K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-7850K vs Core i7-880 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A10-7850K

The A10-7850K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,394 points. Launch price was $173.

Intel

Core i7-880

The Core i7-880 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.73 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,429 points. Launch price was $583.

Processing Power

The A10-7850K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-880's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A10-7850K versus 3.73 GHz on the Core i7-880 — a 7% clock advantage for the A10-7850K (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The A10-7850K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-880 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7850K scores 3,394 against the Core i7-880's 3,429 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-880. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 510 vs 507, a 0.6% lead for the A10-7850K that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-7850K vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-880.

FeatureA10-7850KCore i7-880
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4 GHz+7%
3.73 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+21%
3.06 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+1500%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Godaveri (2014−2016)
Lynnfield (2009−2010)
PassMark
3,394
3,429+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
510
507
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,478
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7850K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-880 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10-7850K versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-880 — the A10-7850K supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-7850K supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A10-7850K) and P55,H55,H57,Q57 (Core i7-880).

FeatureA10-7850KCore i7-880
Socket
FM2+
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-2133+60%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+100%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-7850K) vs Yes (Core i7-880). The A10-7850K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Core i7-880 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7850K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-7850K rivals Core i3-4340.

FeatureA10-7850KCore i7-880
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Yes
Target Use
Budget