A10-7850K
VS
Xeon W3565

A10-7850K vs Xeon W3565

AMD

A10-7850K

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 4 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Xeon W3565

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.46 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-7850K is positioned at rank 375 and the Xeon W3565 is on rank 827, so the A10-7850K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10-7850K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5510%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5207%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3780%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1139%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
902%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
789%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
452%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
446%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
406%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
406%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
402%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
391%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
385%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
384%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
380%
#324
Core i7-12700TE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $350
100%
#325
Core i9-12900E
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
100%
#326
Celeron G4900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $40
99%
#327
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $452
98%
#328
Core i9-9900KS
MSRP: $513|Avg: $350
98%
#329
Core i5-11600T
MSRP: $262|Avg: $262
97%
#330
Core i9-9900K
MSRP: $488|Avg: $331
97%
#331
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
MSRP: $899|Avg: $540
96%
#332
Celeron G4930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
96%
#375
A10-7850K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#378
Ryzen 5 1600
MSRP: $219|Avg: $144
99%
#385
Pentium G4560
MSRP: $64|Avg: $85
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W3565

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
18025%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3403%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
3024%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2336%
#469
EPYC 9554
MSRP: $9087|Avg: $2795
100%
#470
Xeon Gold 6338T
MSRP: $3139|Avg: $1795
99%
#471
Xeon E5-2650 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $45
99%
#472
EPYC 9845
MSRP: $13564|Avg: $8670
98%
#473
EPYC 7F32
MSRP: $2100|Avg: $179
96%
#474
EPYC 9654P
MSRP: $10625|Avg: $5345
95%
#475
EPYC 9965
MSRP: $14813|Avg: $10000
94%
#827
Xeon W3565
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
100%
#837
Xeon W3550
MSRP: $294|Avg: $30
96%
#839
Xeon E5-2450
MSRP: $694|Avg: $795
94%
#840
Xeon E5-2630L v2
MSRP: $612|Avg: $149
94%
#842
Xeon E3-1246 v3
MSRP: $667|Avg: $215
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($69) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W3565 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightA10-7850KXeon W3565
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($69)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Godaveri (2014−2016) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A10-7850K ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($69 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightA10-7850KXeon W3565
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($69)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-7850K and Xeon W3565

AMD

A10-7850K

The A10-7850K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,394 points. Launch price was $173.

Intel

Xeon W3565

The Xeon W3565 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,391 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

The A10-7850K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon W3565's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A10-7850K versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W3565 — a 14.5% clock advantage for the A10-7850K (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The A10-7850K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon W3565 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7850K scores 3,394 against the Xeon W3565's 3,391 — a 0.1% lead for the A10-7850K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 510 vs 513, a 0.6% lead for the Xeon W3565 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-7850K vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon W3565.

FeatureA10-7850KXeon W3565
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4 GHz+16%
3.46 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+16%
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+1500%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Godaveri (2014−2016)
Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark
3,394
3,391
Geekbench 6 Single
510
513
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,726
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7850K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3565 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-2133 memory speed. The A10-7850K supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 24 GB 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (A10-7850K) vs 3 (Xeon W3565). PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-7850K) vs 36 (Xeon W3565) — the Xeon W3565 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A10-7850K) and X58 (Xeon W3565).

FeatureA10-7850KXeon W3565
Socket
FM2+
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-2133
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+33%
24 GB
RAM Channels
2
3+50%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
36+125%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-7850K) vs Yes (Xeon W3565). The A10-7850K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Xeon W3565 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7850K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-7850K rivals Core i3-4340.

FeatureA10-7850KXeon W3565
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Yes
Target Use
Budget